9/11 Fraud

The Fortunate/Unfortunate Truth About 9/11

2006-10-31T17:10:00.000-08:00

9/11 was fortunate for a few but unfortunate for the many, including you. Watch and learn.

The Category of Terror (9:50)

The Underlying Politics of 9/11, Part 1 (9:17)

The Underlying Politics of 9/11, Part 2 (9:29)

9/11: Press for Truth (1:24:18)

Terror Storm (1:52:45)

Another CIA Analyst Begrudgingly Concedes: 9/11 Was an Inside Job

2006-10-31T14:25:00.000-08:00

Who is Webster Tarpley and Why Does Ex Marine Intel Officer & CIA Analyst Robert Steele Agree with His Assertion that 9/11 Was an Inside Job?

In 1960, Webster Griffin Tarpley was tasked by the Italitan government to study the red brigades that were wreaking havoc in Italy. What he found was shocking. He found that the brigades were being run by a private faction of NATO intelligence. It was a false-flag intelligence operation made to appear as a communist operation.

After the rout in Saigon in 1975, there was a belief that the US and British Empire might collapse worldwide.

HILEX 75 or High Level Exercise 75, was themed around a confrontation between top officials with the option of pulling NATO countries into nuclear confrontation with the Soviet Union.

Following the Spiegel leak, Tarpley spent Christmas Eve of 1975 on the steps of the Milan cathedral, passing out leaflets, warning citizens of the drill and preemptively trying to win minds of those who might be presented with government propaganda after we found ourselves clashing with the Sovet Union as a result of some preconceived provocation. HILEX 75 could mean the 3rd World War, Tarpley said.

Tarpley isn't a nut with theories. His concerns about government exercises had already been validated several times in the past decade or so and would again be validated on the morning of 9/11 and the on the day of the 7/7 London bombings. He has since written "9/11: Synthetic Terror", which is about false-flag terrorism and of it's most crowning success, 9/11.

After years of ignoring such allegations, former CIA analyst and marine intel officer Robert Steele read Webster Tarpley's book and has joined the chorus of colleagues such as William Christionson, Robert Baer and Ray McGovern and concluded that in the very least, the neocons allowed 9/11 to occur and were at some level involved in the larger plot.

As I've previously cited on this network, the evidence is conclusive that Russian intelligence engaged in a similar administrative coup de tat in 1999, delivering Vladimir Putin the same license to stamp out domestic dissent in world where nations are being consolidated into regional power centers and probably somewhere down the line, world government.

Further Reading and Viewing

Watch Tarpley's presentation on the subject of false-flag terrorism here.

The documentary film "9/11: Press for Truth" is the definitive guide on the involvement of Pakistani intelligence (ISI) in 9/11. They were the 80s era coduit the CIA used to fund and train Bin Laden's mujahideen in neighboring Afghanistan. All evidence indicates they were again used as a proxy, a hired gun on 9/11, to use genuine muslim fanatics who didn't realize they were working for ISI officials that were part of a rogue military black-op project conceived by Western financial interests.

Here, Ralph Schoenman addresses the first false-flag terror operation on the trade center, the bombing in 1993.

Watch Schoenman address some of the many Western intelligence connections to 9/11 here.

COVERT USES OF MILITARY EXERCISES

From Tarpley’s Synthetic Terror:

Military exercises come in two varieties – there are the field exercises or live-fly exercises, war games in which real tanks or real planes move around in the fields or the sky. There are also staff exercises, which mainly involve officers assigned to the headquarters, who move markers in a sandbox, map grid, or computer screen.

The classic use of war games has been to prepare a sneak attack. The aggressor army announces that it is holding its summer maneuvers near the border of the target state. The deployment takes place under the cover of press releases announcing that these are merely maneuvers. When the troops are in position, they receive an order for a real attack. If field exercises can be used for fooling the adversary, then staff exercises are more useful for deceiving ones own side. In December 1975, in the wake of the US defeat in Vietnam, when the Pentagon was smarting from the reverse and looking for ways to redress the balance, there were certain circles in NATO who considered using the staff exercise HILEX 75 to set up a confrontation with the Warsaw Pact in Europe.

Staff officers of countries who were not party to that plan were told not to be alarmed by the war preparations they saw; after all, those were only part of a staff exercise. Fortunately, due to the efforts of a network of alert citizens in a number of NATO countries, word got out about the really explosive potential of HILEX 75, and the confrontation option was abandoned. But these are at least two models of how maneuvers can be used for deception that we should keep in mind; there are more. Staff exercises or command exercises are perfect for a rogue network which is forced to conduct its operations using the same communications and computer systems used by other officers who are not necessarily party to the illegal operation, coup or provocation as it may be. A putschist officer may be working at a console next to another officer who is not in on the coup, and who might indeed oppose it if he knew about it. The putschist’s behavior is suspicious: what the hell is he doing? The loyal officer looks over and asks the putschist about it.

The putschist cites a staff maneuver for which he is preparing. The loyal officer concludes that the putschist’s activities are part of an officially sanctioned drill, and his suspicions are allayed. The putschist may even explain that participation in the staff exercise requires a special security clearance which the loyal officer does not have. The conversation ends, and the putschist can go on with his treasonous work.

Most civilians would assume that a military exercise or drill, be it a field or live fly exercise, or a staff drill, would tend to enhance the readiness of the military units taking part. This was the view expressed by 9/11 widow Mindy Kleinberg to 9/11 commission in March 2003, when she remarked that: “… on September 11, NEADS (of the North East Air Defense System of NORAD) was several days into a semiannual exercise known as ‘Vigilant Guardian.’ This meant that our North East Air Defense System was fully staffed. In short, key officers were manning the operation battle center, “fighter jets were cocked, loaded, and carrying extra gas on board.’” (Testimony to 9/11 commission, March 31, 2003) But in reality the maneuvers may have introduced confusion and scattered available resources. The drills included false radar blips, military aircraft pretending to be hijacked, and the transfer of many NORAD fighters to northern Canada
and Alaska.

AMALGAM VIRGO: COVER STORY FOR 9/11

The military exercise called Amalgam Virgo bore a close relationship to the events of 9/11. Amalgam Virgo was a military drill that had to do with hijacked airliners, sometimes from inside the United States, and sometimes used as weapons. A cruise missile was included at least once. The best working hypothesis is that Amalgam Virgo was the cover story under which the 9/11 attacks advanced through the bureaucracy.

Preparations for carrying out 9/11 were conducted under the cover of being preparations for Amalgam Virgo. Most of those who took part in Amalgam Virgo could hardly have been aware of this duplicity.
One of the military officers who had been responsible for organizing Amalgam Virgo ’01 was Colonel Alan Scott. Scott testified on May 23, 2003 at the 9/11 commission hearings:

...MR. ALAN SCOTT: Yes, sir. Specifically Operation Amalgam Virgo, which I was involved in before I retired, was a scenario using a Third World united – not united – uninhabited aerial vehicle launched off a rogue freighter in the Gulf of Mexico.

MR. BEN-VENISTE: That was Operation Amalgam Virgo. In fact, this exercise – in this exercise we used actual drones – NQM-107 drones, which are about the size of a cruise missile, to exercise our fighters and our radars in a Gulf of Mexico scenario.

MR. BEN-VENISTE: You are referring to Amalgam 01, are you not?

MR. SCOTT: Yes, sir, Amalgam 01.

MR. BEN-VENISTE: I am referring to Amalgam 02, which was in the planning stages prior to September 11th, 2001, sir. Is that correct?

MR. SCOTT: That was after I retired, and I was not involved in 02.

MR. BEN-VENISTE: Will you accept that the exercise involved a simultaneous hijacking scenario?

MR. SCOTT: I was not involved in 02.

GEN. MCKINLEY: Sir, I do have some information on 02, if you would allow me to read it for the record.

MR. BEN-VENISTE: Please.

GEN. MCKINLEY: [Reads from briefing book.] Amalgam Virgo in general, 02, was an exercise created to focus on peacetime and contingency NORAD missions. One of the peacetime scenarios that is and has been a NORAD mission for years is support to other government departments. Within this mission falls hijackings.

Creativity of the designer aside, prior motivations were based on political objectives – i.e., asylum or release of captured prisoners or political figures. Threats of killing hostages or crashing were left to the script writers to invoke creativity and broaden the required response of the players.

What this means is that the scenario papers prepared for the officers participating in the drill by collaborating writers included crashing planes into targets; these papers were evidently an integral part of the drill.

McKinley is explicitly acknowledging that the drills did indeed inclued the concept of hijacked aircraft being used as weapons. Ben-Veniste, feigning not to understand this, thought McKinley’s answer was “fatuous,” and added ironically “It wasn’t in the minds of script writers when the Algerians had actually hijacked the plane, when they were attempting to fly into the Eiffel Tower….Don’t you agree we could have been better prepared?” But Amalgam Virgo was not fatuous, it was sinister. Here was an exercise which included many of the elements which were put into practice on 9/11.

Amalgam Virgo thus provided the witting putschists with a perfect cover for conduiting the actual live fly components of 9/11 through a largely non-witting military bureaucracy. Under the cover of this confusion, the most palpably subversive actions could be made to appear in the harmless and even beneficial guise of a drill. In addition, a red herring was built in for the purpose of confusing investigators arriving after the fact: the hijacked planes involved were generally imagined as coming from abroad. But even that covering detail was dubious.
These exercises came up again in the April 2004 hearings of the 9/11 commission. In her much-touted appearance, NSC director Condoleezza Rice repeated her well-known and discredited contention that the White House had not contemplated hijacked airliners being used as weapons. Bush himself had chimed in, asserting that “Nobody in our government, at least, and I don’t think the prior government, could envision flying airplanes into buildings on such a massive scale.” As the hearings showed, during the two years before the 9/11 attacks, NORAD conducted exercises using hijacked airliners as weapons to crash into targets and cause mass casualties. Another scenario involved crashing an airliner into the Pentagon, but this was not conducted after the Defense Department objected that this was too unrealistic. But it was done as a staff exercise – one might say, as a rehearsal. Perhaps it was realistic, but too revealing. One drill, planned for July 2001 but not conducted until later, involved planes from airports in Utah and Washington which were hijacked for the purposes of the drill. These aircraft were then escorted by US and Canadian interceptors to airfields in British Columbia and Alaska.

A NORAD statement issued in April 2004 confirmed that “Numerous types of civilian and military aircraft were used as mock hijacked aircraft. These exercises test and track detention and identification; scramble and interception; hijack procedures; internal and external agency coordination and operational security and communications security procedures.” According to NORAD, these were regional drills, not regularly scheduled continent-wide drills. (USA Today, April 18, 2004) Not surprisingly, there is absolutely no mention of Amalgam Virgo in the report of the 9/11 commission.

Mike Ruppert has contributed much to illuminating the causes of the “complete paralysis of fighter response on 9/11…” Ruppert wrote in June 2004 that he had “obtained an on-the- record statement from someone in NORAD, which confirmed that on the day of 9/11 the Joint Chiefs (Myers) and NORAD were conducting a joint, live-fly, hijack Field Training Exercise (FTX) which involved at least one (and almost certainly many more) aircraft under US control that was posing as a hijacked airliner.” Ruppert also concluded that “There never was a stand down order issued. That would have been way too incriminating and risky a piece of evidence.” (From the Wilderness, June 6, 2004)

The exercises that were conducted on 9/11 were these:

1. Vigilant Guardian

From what is known about Vigilant Guardian, it is clear that it closely mimicked the actual events of 9/11. Vigilant Guardian was thus the source of much confusion among the non-witting NORAD personnel. As we will see, NORAD personnel were bewildered as to whether the reports they were getting represented fictitious events within the exercise, or whether they were dealing with a real emergency. (Aviation Week and Space Technology, June 3, 2002) This was a joint US-Canada exercise, and is designed to test the coordination of the two defense establishments. According to GlobalSecurity.org:

“The VIGILANT GUARDIAN (VG) is a VIGILANT OVERVIEW Command Post Exercise (CPX) conducted in conjunction with USCINCSTRAT-sponsored GLOBAL GUARDIAN and USCINCSPACE-sponsored APOLLO GUARDIAN exercises. The exercise involves all HQ NORAD levels of command and is designed to exercise most aspects of the NORAD mission. One VG is scheduled each year and the length will vary depending on the exercise scenario and objectives.” (www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/vigilant-guardian.htm)

According to another source, “The planning for Vigilant Guardian Exercise-2001 probably began in 2000; and it was responding to a growing uneasiness of the US government and intelligence reports, world-wide – including NORAD – about plans for terrorist seizure of commercial air planes to be used as missiles against American targets.” (www.911teachin.net/L5A.html)

The 9/11 commission had this to say about Vigilant Guardian: “On 9/11, NORAD was scheduled to conduct a military exercise, Vigilant Guardian, which postulated a bomber attack from the former Soviet Union.” This is a very narrow definition of the drill in question, and is probably intended to mislead. The 9/11 commission continues: “We investigated whether military preparedness for the large-scale exercise compromised the military’s response to the real-world terrorist attack on 9/11. According to General Eberhart, ‘it took about 30 seconds to make the adjustment to the real-world situation.’ (Ralph Eberhart testimony, June 17, 2004). We found that the response was, if anything, expedited by the increased number of staff at the sectors and at NORAD because of the scheduled exercise. See Robert Marr interview (Jan. 23, 2004)” (911 commission 458 n. 116) Eberhart’s braggadocio was transparent, and the commission’s verdict was a lie.

Here is one example of the profound confusion engendered by the simultaneous occurrence of drill and real emergency:

FAA: Hi. Boston Center TMU [Traffic Management Unit], we have a problem here. We have a hijacked aircraft headed towards New York, and we need you guys to, we need someone to scramble some F-16s or something up there, help us out.

NEADS: [Staff Sergeant Jeremy Powell, Air National Guard] Is this real-world
or exercise?

FAA: No, this is not an exercise, not a test. (9/11 commission report 20)
Here is the same scene of confusion as described from the standpoint of another participant:

On Sept. 11, as Americans watched horror rain upon New York and Washington, command teams at a little-known military outpost in Rome, N.Y., worked feverishly to restore safe skies and rouse a slumbering homeland defense.

At the Northeast Air Defense Sector, radar operators who constantly scan the continent’s boundaries suddenly faced a threat from within and a race they could not win.

Four months after the terrorist attacks, there are still untold stories. This is one.

6 A.M.: WAR GAMES

Lt. Col. Dawne Deskins figured it would be a long day.

Sept. 11 was Day II of “Vigilant Guardian,” an exercise that would pose an imaginary crisis to North American Air Defense outposts nationwide.

The simulation would run all week, and Deskins, starting her 12-hour shift in the Operations Center as the NORAD unit’s airborne control and warning officer, might find herself on the spot.

Day I of the simulation had moved slowly. She hoped the exercise gathered steam. It made a long day go faster.

8:40 A.M.: REAL WORLD

In the Ops Center, three rows of radar scopes face a high wall of wide-screen monitors. Supervisors pace behind technicians who peer at the instruments. Here it is always quiet, always dark, except for the green radar glow.

At 8:40, Deskins noticed senior technician Jeremy Powell waving his hand. Boston Center was on the line, he said. It had a hijacked airplane.

“It must be part of the exercise,” Deskins thought.

At first, everybody did. Then Deskins saw the glowing direct phone line to the Federal Aviation Administration.

On the phone she heard the voice of a military liaison for the FAA’s Boston Center.

“I have a hijacked aircraft,” he told her.

Three minutes later, the drill was still a factor of confusion for Lt. Deskins in the form of a simulated hijacked plane heading for JFK Airport in New York City:
Deskins ran to a nearby office and phoned 1st Air Force Chief Public Affairs Officer Major Don Arias in Florida. She said NEADS had a hijacked plane no, not the simulation likely heading for JFK.

“The entire floor sensed something wrong,” Chief of Operations Control Lt. Col. Ian Sanderson said. “The way this unfolded, everybody had a gut sense this wasn’t right.” (“Amid Crisis Simulation, ‘We Were Suddenly
No-Kidding Under Attack,”’ Newhouse News Service, January 25, 2002)

It is not clear from this account whether the “simulation” in question was an artificial radar blip inserted on the NEADS screens, or an actual aircraft (piloted or remote controlled) going towards the New York airport.

2. Vigilant Warrior
This drill was identified by Richard Clarke in his recently published memoir. Here is what he writes:

“I turned to the Pentagon screen. ‘JCS, JCS. I assume NORAD has scrambled fighters and AWACS. How many? Where?’

‘Not a pretty picture, Dick.’ Dick Meyers, himself a fighter pilot, knew that the days when we had scores of fighters on strip alert had ended with the Cold War. ‘We are in the middle of Vigilant Warrior, a NORAD exercise, but…Otis has launched two birds toward New York. Langley is trying to get two up now. The AWACS are at Tinker and not on alert’ Otis was an Air National Guard base on Cape Cod. Langley Air Force Base was outside Norfolk, Virginia. Tinker AFB, home to all of America’s
flying radar stations, was in Oklahoma.”

‘Okay, how long to CAP over DC?’ Combat Air Patrol, CAP, was something we were used to placing over Iraq, not over our nation’s capital.

‘Fast as we can. Fifteen minutes?’ Myers asked, looking at the generals and colonels around him. It was now 9:28.” (Clarke 5)

3. Northern Vigilance

Operation Northern Vigilance involved deploying fighter interceptors to air bases in northern Canada and Alaska. It undoubtedly reduced the number of interceptors available to defend the lower 48. Northern Vigilance was supposedly mounted by NORAD to counter a Russian maneuver going on at the same time. It could have been planned in advance provided the timing of the Russian drill had also been known in advance. It was announced publicly in a NORAD press release of September 9, 2001 under the headline “NORAD Maintains Northern Vigilance.” Here we read:

CHEYENNE MOUNTAIN AFS, Colo. – The North American Aerospace Defense Command shall deploy fighter aircraft as necessary to Forward Operating Locations (FOLS) in Alaska and Northern Canada to monitor a Russian air force exercise in the Russian arctic and North Pacific ocean.

“NORAD is the eyes and ears of North America and it is our mission to ensure that our air sovereignty is maintained,” said Lieutenant-General Ken Pennie, Deputy Commander-in-Chief of NORAD. “Although it is highly unlikely that Russian aircraft would purposely violate Canadian or American airspace, our mission of vigilance must be sustained.” NORAD-allocated forces will remain in place until the end of the Russian exercise.

NORAD conducted operation Northern Denial from December 1 to 14, 2000 in response to a similar, but smaller scale, Russian deployment of long-range bombers at northern Russian air bases. NORAD-allocated
forces were deployed to three FOLS, two in Alaska and one in Canada.

More than 350 American and Canadian military men and women were involved in the deployment.

The net effect of Northern Vigilance was drastically to reduce the number of fighter interceptors available at airports in the lower 48 states of the continental US. It is not known exactly how many planes moved north.

4. Northern Guardian

This drill is the least documented. It may have involved a complement to Northern Vigilance; one group of planes might have played the attackers, while another group played the defenders. A reference to this drill was found in the Toronto Star, December 9, 2001. At the very minimum, it appears to have been a northern Canada-Alaska-centered drill, which would have increased the presence of planes from the lower 48 moving to those areas.

5. National Reconnaissance Office Drill

This drill simulated an airplane crashing into the headquarters of the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) in Chantilly, Virginia, near Dulles Airport. It meant that the employees of the NRO were evacuated from their buildings just as the 9/11 attacks were actually taking place. The AP ran a story about this drill under the headline “Top US Intelligence Agency was to simulate plane crash into government building on September 11, 2001.” The story stated that “a US intelligence agency was planning an exercise last Sept. 11 in which an errant aircraft would crash into one of its buildings.” (AP, August 21, 2002)

The NRO was a supersecret agency responsible for spy satellites and other eavesdropping from space. It was created in 1960, and its existence was not officially acknowledged for some 32 years. The NRO draws its personnel from the military and the Central Intelligence Agency and has a budget equal to the combined budgets of both the CIA and the National Security Agency. On 11 September 2001, the NRO director was Keith R. Hall, who had headed the agency since 1996. In his capacity as DNRO, Hall was responsible for the acquisition and operation of all United States space-based reconnaissance and intelligence systems. At the same time Hall also served as Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Space. As Nico Haupt has pointed out, Booz Allen Hamilton is a prominent subcontractor for the NRO.

The obvious effect of evacuating the NRO was at least temporarily to blind institutional US intelligence to events which could have been monitored from space. NRO could have provided a real time view of the air space over North America; as a result of the evacuation, this may not have been available. The advantages for the perpetrators are obvious.

5. Tripod II

Tripod II was a biological warfare exercise conducted jointly by the US Department of Justice and the City of New York; it was scheduled for September 12, 2001, and formally speaking never took place. Its obvious relevance was to provide a cover for various pre-9/ 11 activities in New York City.

It would seem that the code name “Tripod II” was revealed for the first time in testimony by former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani at the 9/11 commission; however, the basic facts about this exercise had been described by Giuliani in his self-serving memoir, Leadership, published in 2002. Here the former Mayor wrote:

For months, we had in place an exercise in which we’d drill on our response to a biochemical attack, specifically practicing for the distribution of medication. The
planned date: Wednesday, September 12. We had stored much of the materials for that drill at Pier 92. Pier 92 offered 125,000 square feet of open space and easy transportation to and from Ground Zero by way of boat and the West Side Highway. Moreover, because it was already in use by the military, the points of access were relatively easy to guard.” (Giuliani 355)

After Giuliani’s unusable command center in WTC 7 had been destroyed by the inexplicable collapse of that large building, he transferred his command post to Pier 92.

Bin Laden Working for CIA Proxy, Bush-Like Mascot Follows Orders Just the Same

2006-09-08T06:52:00.000-07:00

PNAC

After the patriotic orgy following 9/11 subsided and it was no longer taboo to dare ask whether the events may have been allowed to occur not unlike Pearl Harbor, given the inconceivable failures - or so they initially seemed - in investigatory and aerospace defense procedures not to mention how convenient it was for the PNAC administration whose members described such an event as a "catalyst" for world domination in their own documents a year prior, the 9/11 Truth Movement was born.

9/11: Press for Truth

It was borne out of the "Jersey Girls" struggle to find the truth about what led to the deaths of their husbands and children since the official account of 9/11 varied from one individual to another, was largely incomplete and was contradicted almost on a daily basis, most often by government officials themselves. While the launch orders to strike Afghanistan circulating the White House in the days prior to 9/11 was being executed, the Jersey girls lobbied for a commission to look into the so-called government failures which led up to and occured on 9/11 and due to their large public support base, the feds reluctantly gave in to the Jersey Girls, or so we thought.

President Bush initially wanted to appoint Henry Kissinger but decided against it since a man with such a well known sordid history would not serve as the best public face for what would end up being the most important whitewash in American and maybe world history. He instead chose Thomas Kean, an oil man who stood much to gain from shining the turd that is the officials story. The laundry list of criminal individuals chosen to chair the rest of the commission would have made even Lyndon Johnson jealous and I'm certain their conclusions indeed made Arlen "Magic Bullet" Specter blush. The "Big Oil Keane - October Surprise Hamilton Commission" was touted over and over for it's bi-partisan nature. After all, it's a known fact that when you have a (D) in front of your name, you magically disregard your political and business connections and/or your involvement in the events.

Given the ridiculousness of the C-Span Circus, some Americans began shunning the talking heads on television and considered the allegations of alternative media - researchers, radio hosts and authors - concerning the events of 9/11, those which alleged that individuals in key positions of power did in fact pull strings to see to it that 9/11 would occur and perhaps even compounded the destructive nature of the attacks with unseen methods.

One such widely-held belief among those alleging 9/11 was an "inside job" is the notion that explosives were planted in the twin towers and building 7 prior to the plane impacts and detonated afterwards, causing them to collapse. Not long after 9/11, Donald Rumsfeld began spewing crazy conspiracy theories involving the Pentagon and Flight 93, which crash-landed in Pennsylvania.

Many thought they were verbal gaffes and others bought into such theories whole-heartedly. Though I'm reluctant to do so, I must admit that I still have some questions regarding the Pentagon attack which weren't satisfied by the official story, such as how a plane alleged to have vaporized upon impact, hitting the only wall reinforced to withstand a missile just days before 9/11 could have at the same time torn through so many of it's concentric rings as well as why the federal government is to this day withholding dozens of security cameras that caught more conclusive footage of whatever hit the Pentagon than we've since been given. However I tend to stay away from the fringe and stick to challenging that which is closest to the heart of the feds' arguement, the notion that a plot to strike the US was hatched by fanatical religious interests seeking to take down the United States and not those which sought to forge America in a "Reichstag Fire" event, like a nazi scepter's phoenix out of the ashes of 9/11.

As the years passed, growing frustration caused an already significant 9/11 Truth Movement - which appeared to have hit a brick wall lobbying for support from skeptics - to opt instead for pushing more radical theories, notions that even what little we know about the events, was also a fraud. It remains to be seen whether Alex Jones hit the nail on the head by suggesting that the federal government was using the pentagon as a "honey pot", that is to say, intentionally acting suspicious with regard the event in order to cause the movement to embrace alternative theories so it could consequently be dealt an embarassing blow when the feds reveal conclusive evidence proving the official story was indeed true, for instance video of Flight 77 striking the pentagon from a much closer vantage point. Such an event would certainly prevent some prospective recruits from joining the ranks of the 9/11 Truth Movement and cause others who had previously been sitting on the fence to embrace and exalt the media spin that would follow, declarations that "since a plane hit the pentagon, 9/11 was obviously not an "inside job".

In my years of research, I've found compelling evidence which points to various individuals and interests but none so little as religious extremists or their cause. Clearly, the US federal government and their imperial allies have been shaken by a recent suggesting that the federal government was using the pentagon as a "honey pot"Scripps Howard Poll which concluded that a third of Americans believe that elements of the US Government either orchestrated the attacks altogether or allowed them to happen since they have since alleged that the liquid bomb plot patsies in London watched "9/11 conspiracy documentaries" and the Pentagon has prepared documents alleging that "conspiracies" (WMDs in Iraq/Syria, Israeli soldiers in Syria) create an environment conducive to breeding resentment, anger and consequently terrorism. While such a notion sounds plausible since most all of us can agree that emotions are real regardless of whether they're rooted in fact, it doesn't necessarily translate into causing individuals to risk life and liberty by becoming suicide bombers or nuking entire cities.

Rather, it is the occupation of foreign lands, the support for dictatorial regimes that have killed an estimated 10 million people and the body parts of your so-called colaterally damaged loved ones strewn up and down the streets which are the root causes of Saudi youths fleeing into the arms of military-industrial complex agents claiming to share in their cause, agents employed by Pakistan's ISI whose leaders network with their parent organization, the CIA.

Since the PNAC administration and their Clean Break counterpart's transparent posturing to engage Iran - probably in the wake of unrealized "false-flag" events - Iranian officials have now stated the obvious and publicly claimed that 9/11 was the product of a US/Israeli conceived black-op, which has for the forseeable future, dealt the 9/11 Truth Movement a worse blow than the US Government ever could, since no self-described conservative supporting the Trotskeyite neocons would ever take a position that a so-called "Islamo-fascist" Iranian would. After all, the neocon cheerleaders are the fringe group who called Lou Dobbs liberal for wanting to enforce a border policy, something that George Bush, Vicente Fox and Paul Martin have since discreetly made a pact to dissolve much to the dismay of Ronald Reagan, who has since followed all former US presidents and turned over in his grave, if he hadn't already.

"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I cannot tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It's classified information."

-- US official quoted in Carl Cameron's Fox News report on the Israeli spy ring and its connections to 9-11.

Fearing that Iran's statements might cause some in the left who realize the Iranians are not the fire-breathing monsters our mockingbird media and their administration have alleged, the feds have played one of their final aces before the the poker table gets thrown over and the guns come out, by releasing video of ISI agent and House of Saud family friend Osama Bin Laden meeting with 2 of the 15 Saudi hijackers but not their older handlers, who were seen on video sniffing coke and partying in strip clubs as well as on Jack Abramoff's casino cruiseline off the coast of Florida in 2001, according to the Associated Press.

In a move that is arguably just as brilliant, they played another ace by declaring that Pakistan is now cozying up to Al Qaida and the Taliban once again which will cause a rift in US/Pakistan relations. Why is this brilliant? Because it neutralizes the argument that Pakistan's ISI were already in bed with Al Qaida and the Taliban, having flown them to safety in Pakistan prior to Operation Enduring Freedom, leaving mostly innocent young goat-herders to get swept up and traded to US officials at $5,000 a head by Northern Alliance militants who are now running the ISI's exploding opium crops while the US oil pipeline lays across the barren Afghan wasteland. It seeks to neutralize the arguement that 9/11 was a product of the CIA's proxy organization, explaining why the Pentagon appears to have known the attacks were coming, taking steps to ensure the success of the attacks.

On December 11th 2002, chairman of the Senate intelligence committee Bob Graham was interviewed by Gwen Ifill on PBS News Hour. Below is an excerpt from their discussion:

GRAHAM: "I think there is very compelling evidence that at least some of the terrorists were assisted not just in financing – although that was part of it – by a sovereign foreign government and that we have been derelict in our duty to track that down, make the further case, or find the evidence that would indicate that that is not true and we can look for other reasons why the terrorists were able to function so effectively in the United States."

IFILL: "Do you think that will ever become public, which countries you're talking about?"

Now listen to Graham's bombshell...

GRAHAM: "It will become public at some point when it's turned over to the archives, but that's 20 or 30 years from now. And, we need to have this information now because it's relevant to the threat that the people of the United States are facing today." (24) (emphasis added)

Senator Graham is suggesting that US intelligence knows which foreign government helped the terrorists, but the government isn't going to tell us for another 30 years! Given the current state of anti-Muslim war hysteria being promoted by the media and government, common sense dictates that if an Arab government besides Saudi Arabia or Pakistan was ever discovered to have sponsored 9/11, we'd be seeing the evidence night and day on the controlled media, and hearing about it non-stop from all the President's warmongers as well as the Israeli-occupied US Congress and Senate.

I include Pakistan specifically because several of those who appear to have had more influence in the planning moved comfortably on the grid in Pakistan, were alleged to have been under orders by ISI officials who consequently resigned their positions or have since been arrested by ISI, yet not extradited to the United States, mysteriously enough.

Pakistani General Mahmoud Ahmed resigned from his position in the Pakistani government after it was alleged that he ordered Umar Saeed Sheikh to wire money to Mohammed Atta, the alleged ring-leader of the 9/11 attacks. Strangely enough, Ahmed was in the US a week before 9/11 and in Washington DC meeting with Pentagon and intelligence officials as the twin towers were struck, according to the Washington Post.

Bill Doyle, father of Joseph Doyle who died on the 104th floor of the World Trade Center represents one of the largest 9/11 victims' familes groups. He's been confided in by who he calls reputable people, that 9/11 was funded with American money through Saudi and Pakistani banksstruck. If that is accurate, it would certainly fit with what we know so far. It makes you wonder where 2.6 trillion (2.6 million millions) US tax payer dollars in the Pentagon went, whose pockets it's in, why nobody had been held accountable for it and why Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld thinks it's a laughing matter.

Ladies and gentlemen, the evidence is clear. While Osama Bin Laden is indeed your enemy, he has never been an enemy of the ISI and their parent organization, CIA. Not only can you bet your bottom dollar that the dominant interests in the Bin Laden Crime Family - making billions of dollars off the war on terror - have never really cast out so-called black sheep Osama, the House of Saud and the ISI are the Bushes and the CIA's link between Osama Bin Laden and company. They need not talk because they share mutual friends. Osama Bin Laden is NOT, I repeat.. IS NOT in it for what you think he is. He is an agent of the same multi-headed beast which certain elements - NOT ALL but certain individuals - including the executive branch of the US federal government, are a part of.

You must, I repeat.. MUST take a deep breath, look in the mirror and ask yourself whether you really want to preserve your lives and your liberty as we stand on the precipice of the most horrible suffering the world has ever seen. I ask you to swallow your pride and quietly step away from the chasm. It has been proven that drug-like opiates are released in the brain by reinforcing a position you believe in or denying one which challenges that which you've already come to believe. It takes faith, guts and patience to do this because you literally have to unwire those areas of your brian which have been plugged with mis and disinformation and rewire them with new concepts. It is a tedious and unnerving process.

I ask those 9/11 conspiracy theorists who've been thorougly convinced that it was ALL a product of the US government - feeling that anything less would give them the license to wage a 3rd World War - to do the same and converge where all of the hard evidence points. It points to the fact that our leaders have lied to us. They've all lied to all of us. The war is not between them. It is them in collusion, waging war on us and expanding it to other fronts they and their masters at the CFR seek to consolidate, as they did the EU and and the NAU.

They've had it in the cards since day one. I hope you'll join me in this fight for humanity. Disengage your physical and financial support for this system as soon as possible. Pay off your credit balances and chop up your cards. Turn off your televisions immediately. Accumulating useless goods is not patriotic, no matter what Bush said after 9/11. Buying domestic goods and investing in your own country's economic future, keeping the trade deficit as small as possible so as to minimize the urgency of foreign wars in light of a collapsing dollar while keeping your political leaders on a short leash, is the best chance for stability we have.

9/11 Insider Trading Linked to the CIA

2006-09-02T22:24:00.000-07:00

October 12, 1999: General Musharraf Takes Control of Pakistan; Ousted ISI Leader Has Curious Finances

August 6, 2001: Suspicious Trading of Companies Affected by 9/11 May Begin by This Date

Early September 2001: Almost Irrefutable Proof of Insider Trading in Germany

Early September 2001: Suspicion of Insider Trading in Many Other Countries

October 16, 2001: Bin Laden Cleared of Insider Trading in Britain

June 3, 2002: The Results of 9/11 Related Insider Trading Inquiries Are Still Unknown

March 31, 2003: US Government Draws Harsh Criticism at First 9/11 Commission Hearing

September 10, 2003: SEC, Others Still Keep Mum About Insider Trading Investigations

September 19, 2003: FBI Claims No 9/11 Insider Trading

April 25, 2004: Academic Paper Determines 9/11 Insider Trading Not Due to Chance

July 22nd, 2004: Bush's Begrudgingly Appointed 9/11 Whitewash Commission Claims "No Insider Trading"

If 9/11 was an Inside Job

2006-09-02T21:09:00.000-07:00

Below was my response to a person who asked the following question on a News & Politics Message Board:

"If 9/11 was an inside job and America is supposedly turning into a police state, how come my life hasn't changed since 9/11? I haven't seem to have lost any rights..", yada yada yada.

You build a prison one brick at a time. You don't put people in it until it's finished. I'm sure they love people like you. Hundreds of millions of lives have changed since 9/11. Your life will change. Give it time, Hessian slave.

Elements of the CIA, MI6 and NATO blew up trains, planes and buses for over 30 years in Operation Gladio among others, blaming communist subversives. Rumsfeld was ambassador to NATO when the program started. Then in Ford's administration, he tried to tie all international terrorism to the Soviets. The CIA officially stated that his claims were unfounded as well as his fear-mongering of Soviet submarines that allegedly didn't run on harmonics and thus couldn't be detected. The same unfounded claims he and his associates used then to amp up the arms race and egg on World War 3, they are again using to egg on World War 3, even the same false-flag events, just on a larger scale.

The FBI has as much on Bin Laden as authorities do on John Mark Karr, the self acclaimed murderer of Jon Benet Ramsey. FBI Chief of Investigative Publicity Rex Tomb has begrudgingly admitted so just recently. Bin Laden is not wanted for 9/11 because he didn't orchestrate 9/11. You make of his videotaped admission of guilt what you want. Some believe it's fake, that the voice-print doesn't fit, etc. I have no illusions about who he is, what his family are about and who they're involved with. They're a crime family who engage in various fraud for the military industrial complex. It's all about money, not Islamic extremism. People will believe Judas sold out Christ for a few pieces of silver but that you can't find a single person of similar character in the Islamic world. That's pretty funny. Money, which can buy anything sinful, cannot sway an Islamist apparently. Not a single, solitary one of them.

The CIA, the Pentagon and other arms of the US defense and intelligence establishment have a long history of not only engaging in false-flag terrorism but cooperating with groups like the mafia, anti-Castro Cubans and even their proxy ISI's make-believe "Al Qaida", a patsy operation fleshed out by Osama Bin Laden's former cabbie and given it's name by our own intelligence community after which Bin Laden only allegedly began referring to such an organization. Even this is suspect since the CIA has documentedly cooked up fake admissions of guilt by now allegedly vanquished Zarqawi in Iraq for events he had no hand in. Perhaps his status was a fraud altogether.

I couldn't help but laugh how every statement he made couldn't be more politically expedient for the military-industrial complex, giving them the license to stay in Iraq they themselves were lobbying for amid heightened debate about our presence there. You really have to be low-grade moron not to see how Ayman al-Zawhiri too follows the same White House talking points, saying they needed to be poised to move into Iraq and "fill in the gaps" as the Americans, who demonstrated their weak resolve in Viet Nam would inevitably pull out prematurely.

Now after the "catastrophic and catalyzing" "new Pearl Harbor" event which Rumfeld and the other 15 PNAC members who wound up in Bush's administration stated they needed as a pretext for world takeover, an event they referred to a year before the election in their "Rebuilding America's Defenses" document, an event which has since occured (9/11), the world is again plauged by train and bus bombings. Only instead of the Soviets (US, UK, NATO), it's Al Qaida (US, UK, Israel, Pakistan).

Do you understand that the 1993 World Trade Center bombings, 9/11, 3/11 (Madrid), 7/7 (London) and allegedly the Bali bombings (10/1) and the Heathrow plot though I'm unable to confirm those 2, were organized by agents of 4 intelligence agencies? These men were funded, protected and surveilled by the CIA, MI6, Mossad and ISI, not Iraq, Iran and Syria. Do you not even realize that this is in fact admitted by the Western intelligence establishment while they spin the involvement as a few bad apples, a few "double agents"? Certainly this was not sanctioned from the top, lol. I explain it all in this blog post (Part1, Part2)

The plan to invade Iraq was conceived long before 9/11 according to several White House staff members and Bush associates (1, 2, 3), the plan to invade Afghanistan was circulating the White House 2 days before 9/11, White House officials stopped flying commercial aircraft in the days before and told their friends to do the same and drills on the morning of 9/11 - which we can now confirm from NORAD audiotapes released just weeks ago - confused aerospace defense personnel, something "conspiracy theoriests" alleged for years. If the confusion the drills created weren't enough, the situation was only compounded by the fact that for the first time in history, fighter pilots were required to stay on the ground and wait for authorization by the Secretary of Defense before they even so much as engaged errant aircraft, flights which deviated from their pre-set flight plans. Why was this? Because on May 31 2001, former Enron executive Thomas White was appointed Secretary of the Army by Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. On his first day on the job when you would think he would be getting settled into his new office, hite radically altered existing DOD protocols and issued a new directive placing all decision-making powers, specifically in the case of 'Derelict Airborne Objects' into the hands of his boss Donald Rumsfeld.

Not only did they have their plan to invade Afghanistan in mid-October ready, they had scheduled to arrive in New York on the morning of 9/11 to engage in a bio-warfare exercise so when the planes struck the towers, they would do the only thing government officials know how to, elicit the response they're trained to through their Pavlovian conditioning. FEMA went to work that morning, cleaning the military-industrial wound so the stock market could open once again, unleashing the floodgates of millions of dollars in short options placed on United Airlines and corporate tennants in the World Trade Center, trades which lead right to CIA officials.

This is not even the tip of the iceberg. The amount of hard evidence implicating the feds in these attacks - evidence which has nothing to do with bombs in the buildings, flight 93 being shot down or a missile hitting the pentagon - is mind-boggling and would take hours upon hours to address. They vet patsies or genuine Islamic extremists who don't know they're working for intelligence community and the operations are disguised internally as sting-ops in case things don't go as planned. If cover is blown, they say it was an accident (93 WTC bombing). Military or inteligence exercises occur in conjunction with the actual attacks to confuse inter-agency personnel. Not only were they running drills on the morning of 9/11, the 7/7 London bombings were coordinated with drills themed around simultaneously detonated explosives. In 1999, officials in Russia's FSB proved the real benefit of exercises themed around false-flag terrorist attacks.

The 10 Chapters I wrote in my most recent 2 part blog series addresses about 1/3 of the information if I may estimate and that's only a 1/3 of what I'm consciously aware of at the moment. I'm probably being too generous in my estimate.

Again.. Your life will change. America's noose is being waxed and oiled right now. Give it time. You're not going to take down the freest, most cautious nation with respect to government power over it's citizens in the history of the world overnight. They're building the prison around you, telling you the bricks are not bricks, putting a latch on the exit, telling you it's not a latch.

You think you're on the outside looking in when you're really on the inside looking out. Not only is there alot of wealth to be extracted from the Middle East if you can get an army obedient enough to do it, there's lots of wealth to extract from the "Homeland" too. Not only is it easier to get away with such a thing, it makes political and economic opposition to your long-term agenda less threatening and ensures a steady flow of down-trodden, misguided youth with no means to provide for themselves or their prospective familes than to do what? Join the military or a service oriented market, eg. government.

3rd World, here we come!

The Bin Laden Crime Family is CIA Connected

2006-09-02T20:25:00.000-07:00

November 1979: Bin Laden Brother Tied to Terror Act

October 1980: Osama’s Oldest Brother Allegedly Involved in October Surprise

Mid-1980s: Osama’s Brother Is Allegedly Involved in the Iran-Contra Affair

1988: Bin Ladens Bail Out George W. Bush?

1988: 6 Bin Laden Family Members Linked to Bank with Terrorist Connections

1991: Bin Laden Brother-in-Law Linked to Islamic Militant Group

1991: Islamic Militant Brother-in-Law Held in the US and Let Go

June 4, 1992: FBI Investigates Ties Between Former CIA Directror and Bin Laden Associate

February-September 11, 1996: Investigation of bin Laden Family Members Is Opened; Then Closed

Shortly After April 1994: Bin Laden Family "PUBLICLY" Disowns Osama

2000-September 10, 2001: Hijackers Possibly Meet with Associates of Bin Laden's Brother-in-Law in Philippines

2000: $250 Million Bank Transfer Suggests Links Between Bin Laden, His Family, and Pakistani

February 26, 2001: Osama Attends Son’s Wedding with Other bin Laden Family Members

March 8, 2001: US Strangely Declines to Freeze al-Qaeda’s Assets Despite Call from UN and EU

September 11, 2001: Bin Laden Brother Attends Carlyle Group Conference with George Herbert Walker Bush

15, September 14-19, 2001: Bin Laden Family Members, Saudi Royals Quietly Leave US

March 29, 2002: Bin Laden Family Denies Terrorist Connections

November 22, 2002: Bin Laden Family Members Sued

On the Precipice of Unprecedented Human Suffering, Shocking Revalations on the Eve of Uncertainty

2006-08-15T22:18:00.000-07:00

On the Precipice of Unprecedented Human Suffering, Shocking Revelations on the Eve of Uncertainty

Table of Contents

Part 1: The Enemy Within

Chapter (1)
Documented Collusion between the Intelligence Community and Terrorist Organizations

Chapter (2)
Short Summary of Documented Western Intelligence Involvement in False-Flag Terrorism

Chapter (3)
Documented Pakistani ISI Involvement in 9/11

Chapter (4)
The ISI Marionette's CIA Puppet-Masters

Chapter (5)
Documented British MI5/MI6 Involvement in the 7/7 London Bombings

Chapter (6)
Early Evidence Implicates ISI and MI5 in Heathrow Airport Plot to Blow up 10 Airliners

Part 2: What is the Endgame?

Chapter (7)
PNAC & 9/11, The Clean Break & World War 3

Chapter (8)
IDF in Lebanon, the Catalyst is Brewing

Chapter (9)
The Eve of Uncertainty

Chapter (10)
Conclusion

On the Precipice of Unprecedented Human Suffering, Shocking Revelations on the Eve of Uncertainty

Part 1: The Enemy Within

Chapter (1)
Documented Collusion between the Intelligence Community and Terrorist Organizations

It has long been established, though somewhat of a public secret, that state-run intelligence organizations are the biggest contributors to deliberate acts of terrorism against civilian populations in all of history. What is even less known than the extent of state sponsered terrorism, are the state networks' affinity for cooperating with various other criminal organizations not sanctioned by the state, organizations in the private sector. The boundaries of the black-op community are not departmental, nor are they national.

Money knows no boundaries and it's often been said that money is the root of all evil. Why wouldn't it be? If you can't buy a senator, you can buy his constitutents. If you can't buy his constituents, you can buy his enemies. You can buy their colleagues by creating financial incentives to uphold the status-quo of their departure, even if it's a manufactured paradigm on the scale of 9/11. Virtually every member of the Keane commission had every incentive not to get to the bottom of the US federal government's alleged incompetence on 9/11 2001, which can be demonstrated at the highest levels as a conspiracy among certain individuals - some in the US and their allies' defense and intelligence apparatuses - to commit mass murder of American citizens. Money is power and the consequences of 9/11 have been the most successful power-grab in world history, delivering trillions in the sale of chaos (defense), order (reconstruction), oil (sky-rocketing prices) and drugs (Afghan Opium).

The 1975 Church Committee addressed the CIA's willingness to cooperate with the mafia. It's interesting to note that among the CIA's various assassination plots, the September 11th, 1973 assassination of Chilean president Salvador Allende is among them. September 11th was also a date used by the US Government when they ceremonially broke ground for construction of the Pentagon in 1941. Though I myself don't believe in black magic or numerology, the various institutions who network at the highest levels of the international establishment strangely have a disproportionately larger concentration of people who engage in occult rituals and build architecture according to occult laws than the general population and the evidence of this is the fruit of their own admissions. Though this is only a very brief look at the phenomenon which cannot do justice to the entire body, I plan to expand upon it at a later juncture.

I think it's also interesting to note that the twin towers, lobbied for by the Rockefeller brothers whose CFR organization that PNAC grew out of - were essentially a giant 11 and composed of 110 (11) stories each. PNAC members Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Jeb Bush and William Krystol stated clearly in their own documents prior to 9/11 just like Jimmy Carter's national security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinkski, founder of the CFR's counterpart organization the Trilateral Commission previously did in his book "The Grand Chessboard: America and It's Geostrategic Imperatives", that a "new Pearl harbor" event would be an effective catalyst for sparking an imperialist agenda for US interests, interests which are largely shared by the top 2% of Americans, not the "dumb animals" they send off to war, as Henry Kissinger calls them. Bush referred to 9/11 as such - "the Pearl Harbor of the 21st century" - in his diary on the night of 9/11, according to the Washington Post.

Declassified documents have addressed the CIA's involvement with Italy's 1982 Bologna Massacre masterminds at the P2 Masonic Lodge and various other false-flag terrorist attacks against innocent civilians in Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Asia and Latin America over the course of 30 years. Most of them were train and bus bombings strikingly similar to the alleged al Qaida attacks now plauging the world. The Gladio bombings however, were blamed on communist subversives. The current bombings appear in the least to have Islamic fundamentalists as willing participants but the extent of documented Western intelligence involvement as organizers demonstrates for any rational, thinking individual that they are in fact inside jobs, most likely without the knowledge of the bombers themselves, set up like entrapment stings allowed to be executed rather than thwarted.

Note that they all take place on the 11th or dates where the month/day relationship is a multiple of 11. Even ABC's Brian Ross recognized this much. 9/11, 3/11 (Madrid), 7/7 (London) [77 is a multiple of 11], 10/1 (Bali) [11] and 7/11 (Mumbai) all follow this pattern. Again though, this is only an hors' dourve. The main course, Western intelligence involvement, is already admitted in the 9/11, 3/11 and 7/7 attacks, unbeknowest to most people as we will establish later in chapters 3, 4 and 5.

First though, we will segway into the documented and admitted acts of false-flag terrorism by criminal elements of Western intelligence and their allies in Chapter 2 and more specifically their documented and admitted aid and orchestration of attacks within their own borders in Chapters 3, 4 and 5 by dispelling the notion that they would be involved at any level with what are perceived as Islamic fundamentalist sects (Al Qaida, etc.) in a couple of the many historical examples that demonstrate just that below.

One such example is the MI6 organized assassination attempt on Lybian president Colonel Mu 'ummar al-Qadhafi in 1996. MI6 used the Lybian al Qaida front group Al-Muqatila whose operations were not successful. Innocent people were killed as a result.

The following is an excerpt from cooperativeresearch.org, describing that plot:

Al-Muqatila, a cover for a Libyan al-Qaeda cell, tries to kill Libyan leader Colonel Muammar al-Qadhafi. Al-Qadhafi survives, but several militants and innocent bystanders are killed. [Dawn (Karachi), 10/30/2002] According to David Shayler, a member of the British intelligence agency MI5, and Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquié, authors of the controversial book The Forbidden Truth, the British intelligence agency MI6 pays al-Qaeda the equivalent of $160,000 to help fund this assassination attempt. Shayler later goes to prison for revealing this information and the British press is banned from discussing the case (see November 5, 2002). [New York Times, 8/5/1998; Observer, 11/10/2002 Sources: David Shayler, Jean-Charles Brisard, Guillaume Dasquie] Anas al-Liby, a member of the group, is given political asylum in Britain and lives there until May 2000 despite suspicions that he is an important al-Qaeda figure (see Late 1996-May 2000). He is later implicated in the al-Qaeda bombing of two US embassies in Africa in 1998 (see Late 1993-Late 1994; August 7, 1998). [Observer, 11/10/2002; Federal Bureau of Investigation, 2002]

Some might be inclined to believe that because of their larger Muslim population, British intelligence would be more likely than their US counterpart to use Islamic fundamentalist assets to advance their geostrategic goals and that like the CIA has claimed of itself in the past, they are bumbling fools in the world of Islamic fundamentalism, needing the extra authority and tax-payer money to counter such threats as they have been given with the Patriot Act and Reichland Security.

Such advancements in power were also awarded to them as a consequence of other so-called lapses in the security apparatus such as Pearl Harbor, the Oklahoma City bombing and the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, all events in which crucial details were either not initially reported to the public and those which were reported, assembled to fit an interpretation deemed safe for public consumption as you will later see.

The notion that the CIA is merely incompetent with regard to affairs in the Muslim world just doesn't jive with history though when you look at their documented and admitted involvement with Osama Bin Laden's Mujahideen and the evidence of their involvement with the Al Qaida organization alleged to have been borne out of that collusion, an organization MI6 never intended to share affiliation with and one their CIA ally still claims to share no affiliation.

Such affiliations would lend credence to the notion that their documented and admitted intelligence operatives' involvement with Al Qaida in the acts of 9/11 and the 7/7 London bombings were not a product of double agents but were in fact the product of state sponsered terrorism sanctioned from the very top of their bureaucracies.

Such CIA affiliations have in fact been alleged by various sources. If you disregard the allegations merely on the basis of those making the claims and feel that former Yugoslavian president Slobodan Milosevic's death during his war crimes tribunal was in fact a product of his ailing health alone and not an assassination plot by such interests as he was alleging prior to his death, you may want to bookmark this section and refer back to it later after we demonstrate irrefutably that Western intelligence and their allies, not the "Axis of Evil" they so bizarrely referred to in the wake of 9/11, were involved in the 9/11 attacks and an increasing amount of smaller events since then.

Chapter (2)
Short Summary of Documented Western Intelligence Involvement in False-Flag Terrorism

Are there good people within the CIA and FBI genuinely trying to keep Americans safe? Sure, the great majority of them are.

However, criminal elements of the intelligence agencies have in fact been called upon to engage in acts of false-flag terrorism against their own people and others in order to blame other parties and use the attacks as a pretext for tighter social control domestically or expansion of the financial empire (imperialism).

Elements of the CIA, MI6 and NATO had no problem blowing up childrens' school buses in Eastern Europe in Operation Gladio.

Elements of the Pentagon agreed unanimously to engage in terrorist acts on the American people in 1962 with Operation Northwoods but were turned down by then president John F Kennedy. Why did they bother asking? They should have taken a cue from the intelligence community and done it clandestinely using others in the private sector, people whose actions and locations are not scrutinized and recorded in goverment documentation. Only then will they be as successful as the CIA has!

Not only have elements of the Israeli government had no problem killing Americans in the Lavon affair and the USS Liberty, they're more than happy just like ours, to engage in diabolical, nazi-like experiments on their own citizens which are part of the public record unbeknowest to most people, not unlike our own governments' experiments, for which the list is a mile long.

Operation Gladio was not the only series of terrorist attacks that British Intelligence has engaged in. They've got an interesting track record with regard to false-flag terrorism.

The attacks I've listed are only some of the many terrorist attacks our government and their allies have committed and it's a safe bet we don't know about all of them.

While government crime in the Eastern world appears more overt and equally equally heinous, the crimes of empires are often covert. That is to say that empires often intentionally provoke smaller power blocs or engage in crimes clandestinely in order to blame the target they wish to occupy. Power blocs that are at a disadvantage don't have as much incentive to engage in such covert attacks against themselves because being at the disadvantage they are, they don't have the same incentive to go to war with their larger counterparts. It has been alleged by high-ranking CIA officials themselves that millions of deaths have resulted from the direct intervention of affairs in the 3rd world by thousands of operations, all of them illegal by their own definition.

Chapter (3)
Documented Pakistani ISI Involvement in 9/11

Remember Wall St. Journal Reporter Daniel Pearl?

Just what was he investigating in Pakistan when he got his head axed by Umar Saeed Sheikh? He was investigating various aspects of Pakistani Inter Services Intelligence (ISI), which is like our CIA's eastern counterpart. The CIA and ISI are quite close in the so-called war on terror.

It's suspicious though, why Osama Bin Laden would put out videotapes telling the world that Pakistan is a puppet for the USA. While that much is accurate, it misleads you into thinking Al Qaida and the ISI are two different creatures but if you're even a casual observor of international affairs, it's not hard to see that isn't the case. It's been said there are a few "bad apples" in Pakistan's ISI, some "Al Qaida sympathizers".

Take for instance Pakistani General Mahmoud Ahmed. Indian intelligence helped the FBI investigate a connection between General Ahmed and Umar Saeed Sheikh who wired 100 thousand dollars to Mohammed Atta prior to the 9/11 attacks. General Ahmed resigned his position shortly after this news was released. US news outlets claimed the reason for his departure were his sympathies with the Taliban. Only one Western outlet covered the alleged connection to 9/11 money man Umar Saeed Sheikh.

The Wall Street Journal wrote that the FBI sought General Ahmed's removal after they confirmed Sheikh ordered the 100 thousand dollar transfer at the behest of General Ahmed. The Pittsburgh Tribune however, notes that "There are many in Musharraf's government who believe that Saeed Sheikh's power comes not from the ISI, but from his connections with our own CIA."

There are many other instances where Pakistani ISI officials have aided or given refuge to Al Qaida operatives but let's focus a little bit closer on Mahmoud Ahmed. Some of you may not have realized that he was in Washington DC from September 4th to September 13th, 2001. What was he doing exactly? Just visiting with State Department and Pentagon officials among other things. What other things? How about meeting with CIA director George Tenet as well as eating breakfast with the heads of our House and Senate intelligence committee Porter Goss and Bob Graham on the morning of 9/11?

Porter Goss was later appointed head of the CIA after George Tenet resigned in tears. Bob Graham has since stated that he was surprised to find that there was a state sponser in the 9/11 attacks. Now if it was Iraq or Iran, they would have told us so, don't you think?

The 9/11 Commission claims the origin of the funding was never traced. I wonder if any of that information was on the 2.5 terabytes of data that pentagon officials were told to destroy prior to 9/11, information pertaining to Mohammed Atta. 2.5 terabytes is equivalent to 1/4 of the information in the US Library of Congress.

Chapter (4)
The ISI Marionette's CIA Puppet-Masters

9/11 was a joint operation between individuals, not entire organizations. Some of those individuals encompassed the US, Israeli and Pakistani intelligence apparatuses. Perhaps they'll release more details in 70 years or so when it's released from the national archives though some of us aren't so wilfully ignorant that we can't see what is going on right now. There is a very clear picture as realistic as a Da Vinci oil painting, albeit with a few cracks - missing pieces the conspirators have hidden and most likely destroyed - but nevertheless, we can make out the image just fine.

I'll give the coincidence theorists one thing though. Just because high-ranking US intelligence officials Goss and Graham met with General Ahmed on the morning of 9/11, doesn't mean that they had anything to do with it. I mean, if that were the case, why would Bush have appointed Porter Goss to head our foreign intelligence operations in the CIA? Besides. Goss has an honorable record in the CIA, what with his exploits in Operation 40 alongside such agents as Luis Posada Carriles who was extradited to Cuba last year for blowing up a commercial airliner full of American Olympic atheletes in 1977 and Barry Seal, who has been regarded as one of the most successful drug smugglers in US history. It's interesting to note that 9/11 Commission member Richard Ben-Veniste was Seal's attorney before he was killed in a hail of gunfire.

Though the following excerpt from a blog titled "The Coincidence Theorist's Guide to 9/11" at www.rigorousintuition.com is speculative at best, perhaps you can trace the information to more concrete details. If true, the connections to the dead seal's network are much closer to 9/11 than commission member Ben-Veniste.

"..That 43 lbs of heroin was found on board the Lear Jet owned by Wally Hilliard, the owner of Atta’s flight school, just three weeks after Atta enrolled – the biggest seizure ever in Central Florida – was just bad luck. That Hilliard was not charged shows how specious the claims for conspiracy truly are.

That Hilliard’s plane had made 30-round trips to Venezuela with the same passengers who always paid cash, that the plane had been supplied by a pair of drug smugglers who had also outfitted CIA drug runner Barry Seal, and that 9/11 commissioner Richard ben-Veniste had been Seal’s attorney before Seal’s murder, shows nothing but the lengths to which conspiracists will go to draw sinister conclusions.."

In addition to the ISI's connections to Umar Saeed Sheikh, they also protected 9/11 chief engineer Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and have a sordid history of involvement with Al Qaida in general. It's not a secret that elements of Pakistani intelligence are party to terrorism against US interests so why does our government not care?

'US ignored its own agency's reports on ISI backing Al Qaeda'

Pakistan spy service 'aiding Bin Laden'

More news about Pakistan and Saudi Arabia aiding Al Qaida

According to the FBI, they have no hard evidence linking Osama Bin Laden to 9/11. That's why 9/11 is not on his FBI website resume'.

Is it possible that allegations of the Clinton Crime Family's involvement in the cocaine trade as well as former DEA director Terry Reed, former marine and DEA agent Cele Castillo and Los Angeles narcotics detective Michael Ruppert's assertions that the Bush Crime Family are connected to the same international cabal true or is such a phenomenon only a product of third world banana republics, not the great United States where unchecked power only has a penchant for false-flag terrorism as we've so far documented?

Why entertain such notions when you can just smear the entire documented historical feasability of them as well as the messengers who have in fact written books? After all, retired government officials shouldn't be able to pursue justice and sell it to raise money for distribution of vital information to their fellow Americans. That can only demonstrate a skewed interpretation of history, a sensationalized attempt to make a profit. Only the Bushes, Bin Ladens, Cheneys, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleeza Rice and countless others in Washington regardless of political affiliation have the right to make money off of their exploits, combined billions in the Carlyle Group, Eli Lilly, Halliburton, Lockheed Martin, Bechtel Group and Chevron Texaco among others.

Is it possible that the Bin Laden crime family, whose connections to a wide array of fraud other than terrorism and allegations that their relationship with the Bush Crime Family encompasses more than innocent Carlyle Group business functions also true and that contrary to what we've been told by our intelligence community that the Bin Laden family has not cast out Osama? What reason do we have to take our intelligence community at their word?

Is it possible that Osama Bin Laden has never been anything more than a figurehead for Islamic fundamentalist recruits working for the military industrial complex unbeknowest to those martyrs who exalt him not unlike so many Americans and citizens of other countries who project their own intentions on their political leaders, feeling that the rhetoric is genuine or that even if it is, that they are not at some level owned or manipulated by interests with far more influence than the average citizen?

Nonsense, right? Let us press on but take into consideration that we may have been lied to for so long that the monstrous status quo we see before us is nothing more than a steaming pile of fraud we've allowed ourselves to believe out of sloth and partisanship. It certainly isn't leftist to embrace the notions I'm suggesting though. Most of the left does not but certainly a higher concentration of those who do are from that persuasion since they don't have the same emotional stake in the sense of nationalism the military industrial complex is manipulating, the very nationalism it seeks to destroy on the altar of globalism.

There are no shortage of other lies the left has married itself to which their neoconservative counterparts across the aisle have no problem seeing through. If only man could start acting as such and stop the madness of allowing himself to be baited with ideology and switched with fraud, following mis-leaders like children to the pied piper's song.

Chapter (5)
Documented British MI5/MI6 Involvement in the 7/7 London Bombings

The London bombing orchestrator Haroon Rashid Aswat was a British Intelligence agent.

The alleged ringleader of the attacks though, Mohammed Sadique Khan was an informant for Britain's home office, MI5.

Chapter (6)
Evidence Implicates ISI and MI5 in the Heathrow Airport Plot to blow up 10 Airliners

The following information is a product of excerpts from this article, available at www.prisonplanet.com interspersed with my own observations:

Revelations concerning the origins and connections of the alleged liquid bomb terror plot to Pakistan and the 7/7 bombings in London provide a strong indication that the operation, known for months yet deliberately timed for public release, was a synthetic ruse concocted by the Bush/Blair cabal to re-package the flagging war on terror.

Media reports in the days following the alert cite Pakistan's ISI as having identified Rashid Rauf as, "the link between the plot's planners and British-based Muslims who were allegedly preparing to carry out attacks on transatlantic flights."

According to former NSA official Wayne Madsen, the Lashkar-e-Toiba terror group, to which Rashid Rauf is affiliated, is wholly operated and funded by the Pakistani ISI.

The Pakistani ISI is a CIA front and controls terror cells at the discretion of the highest levels of the US military-industrial complex. This means that the potential mastermind of the liquid bomb plot, Rashid Rauf (pictured), was operating under the oversight and direction of Pakistani and by proxy American intelligence agencies.

In addition to Pakistani ISI's connections to 9/11 "hijacker" money-man Umar Saeed Sheikh and chief engineer of the patsy operation Khalid Sheikh Mohammed which I cited in Chapter 1, it is necessary to understand the the nexus that connects Pakistani intelligence, the CIA and terrorist organizations.

In October 2001, under the headline 'Pakistani Intelligence Had Links to Al Qaeda, U.S. Officials Say,' the New York Times reported, "The intelligence service of Pakistan, a crucial American ally in the war on terrorism, has had an indirect but longstanding relationship with Al Qaeda, turning a blind eye for years to the growing ties between Osama bin Laden and the Taliban, according to American officials."

The ISI has received CIA funds to create and control militant organizations, including the Taliban and Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan.

Defense Intelligence Agency documents dated from 2001 clearly indicate that the CIA is aware that Pakistan's ISI supports and bankrolls Al-Qaeda groups but they have deliberately chosen to ignore the connection.

This rich history of ISI creation and protection of terrorist cells, allied with the fact that the ISI is a known CIA front, and added to the revelation that the mastermind of the liquid bomb plot Rashid Rauf is under ISI control, it is therefore obvious to conclude that the entire charade was cooked and orchestrated by elements of the Bush/Blair cabal and sold as promotional propaganda for the increased surveillance and behavioral control of UK and US citizens.

Are we to believe that this latest alleged plot by Al Qaida which shares the same hallmarks of other set-ups by Western intelligence for the purpose of lending credence to the authenticity of genuine Islamic fundamentalist terror plots on civilian infrastructure in the West, was not orchestrated at the highest levels by the Western intelligence apparatus and their allies just like 9/11 and the 7/7 bombings?

Part 2: What is the Endgame?

Chapter (7)
PNAC & 9/11, The Clean Break & World War 3

For years, there has been much debate about the true motives and justification for the invasion of Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon and now discussion that Syria and Iran may also need to be "dealt with".

In light of the fact that virtually all of the true motives for these wars have been outlined long in advance by the occupiers themselves, I've found it dumb-founding that even those who are not so wilfully ignorant that they believe the rhetoric of the war-hawks, will spend hours upon hours in emotionally charged debate, arguing with the supporters of these conflicts about the true nature of what is behind them while ignoring the most revealing words and actions of the parties who conceived of them in the first place.

Take for instance the Project for a New American Century, also known as "P-NAC". It's a so-called neoconservative (neocon) think-tank assembeled in 1997, which promotes a more aggressive or "hawkish" approach to US foreign policy than was previously the case. It's roots are in the 1992 Pentagon where before it's inception, many of it's future members were referred to by CIA analyst Ray McGovern and others in the White House as "the crazies". PNAC has strong ties to the American Enterprise Institute as well as the Council on Foreign Relations, which is often referred to only by it's initials, the CFR.

To address all of the revealing issues raised by PNAC's various publications would be no small task so we'll just take a look at one document in particular, the often cited "Rebuilding America's Defenses" report. It was the synthesis of contributions by 27 PNAC members, 2 of them - Paul Wolfowitz and Dov Zakheim - who were appointed senior leadership positions at the Pentagon and another - Lewis Libby - who was appointed aide to vice-president Dick Cheney, all of them finding their way into power after George Walker Bush became president in November of 2000. At least 13 other PNAC members were appointed to the Bush administration as well, giving them a total of at least 16 members with direct influence in the US federal government.

It's important to note that Dick Cheney has been referred to as the most active vice-president on foreign policy matters in the history of the United States. He is also a member of the Project for a New American Century so in essence, several signatories of the "Rebuilding America's Defenses" report had not only unparalleled influence over matters of war but of the protection of the United States before 9/11. Don't lose sight of that when viewing these key points:

In PNAC's "Rebuilding America's Defenses" report, the United States is referred to as "the Homeland", which became a label widely used by the Bush administration after the 9/11 attacks. Even the domestic intelligence network created in the wake of 9/11, Homeland Security, took advantage of the label which in it's context has xenophobic, "us against the world" connotations not unlike Adolf Hitler's propagandistic phrase "Faterland". The fact that the Patriot Act is practically a facsimile of nazi Germany's "Enabling Act" is all the more disturbing.

PNAC's report emphasizes preemption and addresses the need for America to aggressively increase it's military spending and engage in, and I quote: "multiple, simultaneous theater wars" of a "large-scale" but acknowledges that none of it would be possible without a "catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor", which would legitamize their agenda in the eyes of Americans. One year after their report was drafted, the 9/11 attacks occured, allowing the PNAC administration to execute their plan.

The question begs to be asked; What kind of enemy other than a group which could conceivably operate anywhere and everywhere ("Al Qaida"), would have given PNAC the broad authority they outlined in their report prior to 9/11? They've actually slated 66 nations for regime change in their publications.

Former US president Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinksi, who is the founder of the Trilateral Commission, counterpart to the CFR which PNAC grew out of, wrote a book in 1997 - the very same year PNAC was founded - titled "The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and It's Geostrategic Imperatives" in which he argued virtually the same case that PNAC would for years to come; that the US needed to secure complete control over the oil in the Middle East and Central Asia. Surprisingly, Brzezinski even alluded to the very same "helpful Pearl Harbor event" which would be the catalyst necessary to get the agenda moving. UK Prime Minister Tony Blair also acknowledged after the fact, that the wars borne out of 9/11 would have not been seen as socially acceptable otherwise. The Washington Post even reported that president Bush wrote in his diary before bed on 9/11: "America was attacked today. It was THE Pearl Harbor of the 21st Century."

All of these social engineering institutions which documentedly vet politicians on both sides of the political aisle for the US presidency and have influence in the press to get them there, argue that all of this is necessary to secure America's position as a unipolar military power. One of the mission objectives listed in PNAC's "Rebuilding America's Defenses" report, is to "deter the rise of a new great-power competitor", basically to cut the legs off any fledgling power, the consequences of which are the kind of economic discontent you'd expect would breed anti-American sentiment in the eyes of the very people we're supposed to be winning the hearts and minds of. I guess it all boils down to whether you'd rather be loved or feared. There are consequences for both but at no point in history has America so openly embraced the option chosen by all doomed empires, the option of fear. The PNAC nazis traded such strong but subtle doctrines as "speak softly and carry a big stick" and "trust but verify" with "bomb now, ask questions later", Israel's failed model.

It should come as no surprise that the Israeli model - right down to the policies on the battlefield and the police state at home - has been adopted by the neocons, seeing as many of PNACs most fervent voices previously outlined a similar foreign policy plan for Israel, which we are also watching unfold.

Now if the absolute plethora of evidence indicating that specific arms of the military industrial complex - US, Israeli and Pakistani government and private interests in the least - were intimately involved in the events of 9/11 cannot make a believer out of you, perhaps the following information will.

President Bush had the signing orders for the invasion of Afghanistan on his desk 2 days before 9/11. This is A-D-M-I-T-T-E-D. For those who still don't believe that elements of the US federal government were in the very least aware of the attacks in advance and had every incentive to thwart the processes that would have prevented it, I must ask you.. Do you honestly believe that an administration which previously acknowledged that such an attack would be integral to executing the agenda which they lobbied for and is now unfolding, at least some of whom we know opted out of flying on commercial airliners for chartered jets in the days before 9/11 and warned others not to fly, had the launch orders for a mid-October attack on Afghanistan ready 2 days before 9/11 for reasons other than because they knew a terrorist attack was to occur in mere days?

PNAC also planned the invasion of Iraq long before 9/11. If the statements in their own body of literature aren't enough to convince you, I suppose you're just going to think that allegations from several former White House officials are merely sour grapes, people like Treasury Secretary Paul O' Neill and Anti-Terrorism Chief Richard Clarke, even Bush's former biographer Mickey Herskowitz.

Some of you are probably saying "Why would the Bush administration (PNAC) have cited the catalyzing pretext, the so-called 'New Pearl Harbor' in their own documents if they were behind the 9/11 attacks?"

First of all, the Bush administration per se' did not plan, nor did they execute the 9/11 attacks. Evidence does seem to indicate that key officials in the administration did have knowledge of a pending attack and took action to thwart investigative bodies and aerospace defense so that the attack could be successful, consequently angering and scaring Americans into accepting whichever measures the US federal government would deem necessary to bring the culprits to justice and prevent another attack but the evidence of planning and execution of the attacks themselves leads us elsewhere.

The body of evidence demonstrates that individuals spanning at least 3 nation states and just as many areas of financial interest (war, oil, drugs) did the actual dirty work and that Osama Bin Laden - heir to massive military industrial fortunes (Carlyle Group, etc.) - also played a role not only on 9/11 but during the decades previous, psychologically laying the groundwork for Americans to accept that naturally, he would be the prime suspect when the "new Pearl Harbor" event did occur.

The CIA's coup on an Iranian democracy and consequent support of a brutal dictator in 1953, their support for the rise of the Baathist party in Iraq, support for the perceived constituency of Al Qaida (Mujahedeen) in 1979 and Israel's involvement in the foundation of Hamas, were all integral in bringing this plan to fruition. All of these groups were strategically placed boogeymen that the intelligence community seeded, knowing there would be a good case for their harvest (removal) later on.

That's why NATOs fatigue colors were changed from dark greens to light browns in the early 70s. The entire infrastructure was shifted in advance of the fall of the Soviet Union - which was also a conflict staged by parties that had unparalleled influence in both the eastern and western world - so that we could move seamlessly into the next phase of the CFR hierarchy's plan for a world government, one that the US is playing a part in creating and will consequently be swallowed by, retaining none of the constitutional protections afforded by it's foundation in 1776. That is the plan, stated by CFR member Carroll Quigley himself, Bill Clinton's mentor at Georgetown University.

PNAC's plans, as we can now say confidently in hindsight, were not only genuine but were made public for the very same reason that so many other details of their agenda are made public. It is to create genuine resistance to the agenda by the parties which are a target of it, eg. Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Iran, North Korea and 60 others. That way, there is perceived justification for the invasion of those who resist the seemingly appropriate demands made in the public forum, demands which are based on fraudulent claims, not on the ones made in their own public documents to foment the very resistance that is desired, the resistance that is necessary to justify invasion and securement of resource and logistical control.

In a nutshell, PNAC wants to sell it's own public on the legitamacy of invasion and at the same time reveal their true motives to the enemy. Their enemy and their own concerned citizens' pleas about the PNAC documents are futile since so many people, as history has shown us, would rather remain wilfully ignorant and be hessian slaves than to see and ackowledge the truth. Adolf Hitler, whose nazi propaganda files the US and UK raided after world war 2, called this concept the "Big Lie". Do you really doubt that criminals in the US government would intentionally destablize the entire world to usher in the bloodiest conflict we've ever known? It can be proven incontrovertibly.

In 1942, US Naval Intelligence drafted the McCollum Memo, an 8 step plan to provoke Japan into attacking the United States, a plan which culminated in the attack on Pearl Harbor. The evidence is now clear that elements of the US government did know the Japanese were planning to attack and intentionally thwarted the procedures which would have prevented others from finding out and preventing it. Sadly, that wasn't the only dirty trick they used to stir up US support for World War 2.

The Viet Nam war, which was responsible for approximately 2 million dead Viet Namese and 60 thousand US troops was also launched or at least widened to the quagmire it became, because of a lie, the Gulf of Tonkin incident which never occured.

Unbeknowest to most, the first Gulf War did not unfold quite as we were told. Saddam Hussein, product of the baathist coup the CIA supported, a man who purchased deadly chemical and biological ingredients from the US government and used them on his own citizens with little more than a brow-beating from the US, sought consultancy on their border dispute with Kuwait in 1990.

Iraq was decimated due to their devestating war with Iran, a war in which the US funded both sides of interestingly. Iraq was in a tough economic position as a result. They claimed Kuwait was drilling their oil on the border. That isn't to say it was true or that they were in the right for targeting Kuwait. However, US ambassador April Gillespie has since stated that then Secretary of State James Baker told her to emphasize the "instruction" to Iraq that "we do not have an opinion on your border dispute with Kuwait" and that " we don't deal with arab to arab affairs."

Given the fact that genocidal campaigns have occured all over the planet for decades with no US intervention, it's not far-fetched to believe that the US would turn the other cheek while their old friend Hussein took care of business. However taking into account Iraq's oil capacity, Hussien's move was ill-advised.

It's already a foregone conclusion in light of not only the skewed and in some cases outright fabricated intelligence of WMDs but a host of other lies told by the Bush II administration, that no obstacle of truth was going to get in their way of invading Iraq in 2003.

Likewise, it is also clear that the Hizbollah/IDF border provocation that sparked Israel's invasion of Lebanon in late July of 2006 was also contrived by the interests that own the Israeli war machine. It should have come as no surprise though. The propaganda trail leading to Lebanon was a mile long; Bush telling Syrian forces to pull out of Lebanon a year prior, then going further by suggesting they should pull their intelligence network out as well, followed by the CIA publicizing what they allege were the beginnings (general shit talking) of a bomb plot on a New York subway tunnel by a Lebanese man, interestingly just days before the Hizbollah/IDF border provocation.

What else could would you expect from the parties that support arming their enemies, their allies in the war on terror and their allies' sworn enemies? The only conclusion you can come to is that the dominant interests of this world have used their influence in both the Eastern and Western worlds for you to take part in so they can make money, kill you as a consequence and control those leftover who have built their modern world, those 500 million they can more efficiently control in the absence of the "useless eaters".

Chapter (8)
IDF in Lebanon, the Catalyst is Brewing

It is now clear that Israel invaded Lebanon as a precursor for events that will lead us and/or them into invading Syria and consequently Iran.

Not only is their motive for such a venture outlined in their own foreign policy documents just like the Pentagon's motive for 9/11 was outlined in their own documents, all indictators demonstrate that their goal was not to destroy Hizbollah but to spark a series of events that would make it appear socially acceptable to extend the war on multiple other fronts.

There was such a blatent disregard or rather high regard for civilian life and infrastructure as prime targets by Israeli intelligence in Lebanon, that many of their own pilots resisted orders to attack alleged Hizbollah targets. We heard reports of direct hits on ambulances and civilian occupied hospitals and the IDF agreeing to a cease-fire only to blow up the bridges they told civilians to leave on following the reignition of conflict only hours later.

Not only by their own admissions was the superior Israeli war-machine's ratio of civilian to military casualties much higher than Hizbollah's, it has even been reported by US and Israeli military analysts that they intentionally allowed pockets of Hizbollah to survive in order to use Hizbollah's consequent missile attacks on Israeli cities as propaganda to incite their population.

Shockingly, while Israel's propaganda machine was busy telling their people that they were losing the war due to their attempts at political correctness - being "too soft" - their own dominance in the US media and oversight by AIPAC and the ADL over that which they don't control, sat back and watched as an unprecedented amount of media attention was given to Israel's heavy-handed tactics in Lebanon, a body of reporting that was so lock-step as a whole that you would swear they were all issued the same talking-points.

Thus we can conclude through joint US and Israeli intelligence in the field of physical battle (Lebanon) and more importantly in the field of psychological warfare (the press), that Israel intended for the world to see the atrocities they so strategically committed with discrimination. The question is why.

Why would the US/Israeli alliance want the world to witness Israel's atrocties while at the same time denying them and absurdly painting the large body of them as the product of a superior Hizbollah propaganda effort aided by liberal tendecies in our own press?

Because whether or not you believe Israel committed the level of atrocities in Lebanon that is alleged, it is in the interest of the US/Israeli alliance to make you think that an upcoming false-flag terrorist attack which will be blamed on Islamic extremists - possibly even Hizbollah - was at least in part the result of Israel's strike on Lebanon and the US military support of that strike.

You might suggest the notion that the US/Israeli alliance drawing attention to themselves as creating the conditions responsible for an attack on their own interests is absurd. However, in the same manner that appearing incompetent on 9/11 caused the majority of people to disregard notions that the US Government was directly involved in the attacks, Israel's perceived incompetence with regard to the Lebanon invasion will also lend credence to the authenticity of another attack, even with that 1/3 of the American population who now believe that 9/11 was either an inside job or intentionally allowed to happen as a pretext for war with the arab world.

As a result of Israel's invasion of Lebanon and the reporting which followed, many will say something to the effect of this after the next 9/11 scale attack:

"Not everything has to be a conspiracy. After all. Israel was harsh in their invasion of Lebanon or at least the arab world thought so due to Hizbollah's propaganda. Still.. that doesn't justify their deliberate attacks on civilian infrastructure. It is now clear due to Syria/Iran/Hizbollah's attack on the US/Israel/UK that we must rid the world of Islamic extremism. Hence, the war in Syria/Iran is necessary."

As a result of the Western intelligence apparatus and their ally Pakistan appearing to thwart several of the very terrorist plots their own agencies seeded to begin with in the past weeks and months, the stage is now set for an attack on the scale of 9/11, one which will look to be the sole work of Islamic extremists in the eyes of the world since the West and their allies have appeared to be interested in thwarting such attacks.

The world has been inundated with incessant media coverage by the Mockingbirds, agents involved in at least several hundreds of millions of dollars in fake news annually in the US alone though it could conceivably encompass hundreds of billions of dollars on an international scale if the operation is being funded by the 2.6 trillion dollars that disappeared from the Pentagon prior to 9/11.

It was reported that Armstrong Williams was paid 250,000 dollars to sell Bush's "No Child Left Behind" education policy prior to the 2004 election. With 2.6 trillion dollars, over 9 million Armstrong Williams could be bought.

Chapter (9)
The Eve of Uncertainty

Since historically, the nature of every major terrorist attack by Al Qaida has been reported in advance by the Western intelligence apparatus as a warning or even in propagandized in entertainment to reinforce the plausibility of it as a consequence, we can assume that the intelligence community's recent stark warnings, even those given to their own first-responders will again be accurate indicators.

If the catalyst for World War 3 is not staged to coincide with the August 22nd date that CIA and Mossad press outlets are scare-mongering will result in an attack by Iran - an attack which will no doubt result in the invasion and destruction of their nation since there is not a snowball's chance in hell that the military might of Iran, Syria and the arab world combined can fend off an attack by even little Israel alone - then the attack will likely either fall shortly after the 2006 mid-term (s)elections in November, the following spring or sometime before the 2008 elections, possibly even resulting in their suspension.

SCENARIOS:

[1] We can assume that the attack might somehow encompass aerospace or train transit which would match the Western intelligence apparatus's historical penchant for striking such targets, lend credence to the notion that the attacks were authentic due to previous attacks on plane and train transit widely believed to have been orchestrated by Islamic fundamentalists and deliver Western interests the perceived authority to control travel everywhere in the same manner Adolf Hitler's terroristic regime used their own false-flag events to demand papers at various checkpoints, especially mass transit.

[2] A massive scale attack on US/UK or Israeli interests, allegedly by Hizbollah and taken credit for by men on videotape claiming to be affiliated with the organization which will be followed by an assault on Syria by the West and/or Israel, aiming to tighten the noose on Iran to the extent that they will consequently see attacking the Western world as their best immediate option in the same manner the US Government intentionally provocateured Japan into attacking Pearl Harbor prior to their involvement in World War 2, as the McCollum memo clearly shows.

The strike could encompass government interests on the scale that even the executive branch is severly decimated, if not altogether decapitated, lending credence to the arguement that the attack was the work of Islamic fundamentalists and not the the government itself since the government surely wouldn't attack itself. In this event, the parties in the line of presidential succession or even the military who survive and seize authority as a consequence should be seen as prime suspects.

[3] An assault on US/UK or Israeli military forces in the region, allegedly by Iran or Syria in the same manner that the US claimed to have been attacked by the Viet Namese in the Gulf of Tonkin, extending the war in Vietnam which was responsible for the deaths of over 58,000 Americans and over a million Viet Namese, sparked by an incident that never happened.

Though Western interests will level the first blow, it's citizenry will likely believe the Iran/Syria axis was responsible for sparking the incident if the military skirmish is simulcast with a synchronized attack on civilian infrastructure, allegedly by Hizbollah or affiliated interests, explained in the first scenario.

METHODS OF ATTACK:

[1] Conventional explosives or shoulder-fired missiles on the targets described in the [1]st scenario above.

[2] Conventional explosives or shoulder-fired missiles on the targets described in the [2]nd scenario above with the option or addition of nuclear devices, even conventional devices with nuclear fallout, AKA "dirty bombs" since the US Government has been constantly war-gaming that scenario in military exercises for the past couple years just as they were war-gaming scenarios of planes flying into buildings in the weeks and months prior to 9/11.

[3] An attack on naval vessels by weapons that are generally seen as used or sold by Iran on the targets described in the [3]rd scenario above.

Chapter (10)
Conclusion

We've so far demonstrated how US, British and Israeli intelligence have colluded with other organizations to execute assassinations and other terrorist acts in order to advance political and financial agendas.

We've demonstrated that US and Pakistani intelligence were involved in the 9/11 attacks, using such tactics.

We've demonstrated that British intelligence was involved in the 7/7 London Bombings, also using such tactics.

We've demonstrated that the recent Heathrow Airport bomb plot was the product of British and Pakistani intelligence, again using such tactics.

We've demonstrated how the US and Israeli foreign policy agendas were strategically designed to destablize the world and initiate World War 3.

What we have not addressed is the entire body of evidence implicating US, Israeli and Pakistani intelligence involvement in 9/11 nor the entire body of evidence implicating British involvement in the 7/7 London Bombings and Spanish involvement in the 3/11 Madrid Bombings.

I avoided the larger picture of the intelligence community's full orchestration and involvement in 9/11 and post-9/11 terrorist attacks to more easily demonstrate how key players in the Heathrow bomb plot were the same players that had integral roles in 9/11 and the 7/7 attacks and just what that means for us going forward.

If you want to see the larger body of evidence implicating US, Israeli, British and Pakistani involvement in 9/11 and various other terrorist attacks using either witting or unwitting Al Qaida front-men, watch the following 5 documentary films at the bottom of this page.

Though some have been compelled to embrace the notion that Israel is entirely behind 9/11 due to their almost dual control of the US pentagon and documented involvement in 9/11, I strongly caution against embracing this alternative for a number of reasons.

I for one believe that 9/11 was conceived almost exclusively by joint US and Israeli interests for the same reasons those who believe Israel had a predominate role do. However I am at odds with them, since I do not believe the US players are mere lapdogs but in fact only cater to Israel's interests because in doing so, they cater to their own. Alot of money is to be made off of "defending Israel", especially through the military and oil contractors. Only the US and Israeli citizenry as well as the targets of their imperialism lose out in the end.

Though I believe that 9/11 was conceived and orchestrated by joint US and Israeli interests through the aid of Pakistanin intelligence, I feel that at least some of the alleged involvement of Israel is disinformation, the product of black-ops and psy-ops orchestrated by Israel to draw attention to their own mysterious (false) connections to 9/11, causing the public to embrace what may ultimately be exposed as false-leads and consequently damaging the 9/11 truth movement since it will be called a tool of anti-semitism by the same US and Israeli propaganda masters that will paint it as such.

TerrorStorm

Masters of Terror

911: Stranger than Fiction Part 1

911: Stranger than Fiction Part 2

911: Stranger than Fiction Part 3

911: Stranger than Fiction Part 4

911: Stranger than Fiction Part 5

Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime

Who Killed John O' Neill?

Loose Change 2nd Edition

Disbelief

Al Qaida Fun with Numbers!

2006-08-15T06:54:00.001-07:00

Numbers 9 & 11

There are 9 Sins, 9 Statements and 11 Rules of Earth in the Satanic Bible

Flight 11 crashed into the North Tower of the World Trade Center on 9/11

The World Trade Center towers appear to be a giant 11 and were made up of 110 floors each.

Pentagon

Washington DC Street Layout

9/11/41 Ground-breaking ceremony for the Pentagon.

9/11/73 Coup on Chilean president Salvador Allende in which the CIA played a part as expressed by then National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger to US President Richard Nixon in a phone conversation (excerpt below).

Nixon: Nothing new of any importance or is there?
Kissinger: Nothing of very great consequence. The Chilean thing is getting consolidated and of course the newspapers are bleeding because a pro-Communist government has been overthrown.
Nixon: Isn't that something. Isn't that something.
Kissinger: I mean instead of celebrating in the Eisenhower period we would be heroes.
Nixon: Well we didn't as you know our hand doesn't show on this one though.
Kissinger: We didn't do it. I mean we helped them. [Garbled] created the conditions as great as possible.
Nixon: That is right. And that is the way it is going to be played.

9/11/87 declared "9-1-1 Emergency Number Day" by US president Ronald Reagan.

9/11/90 US president George Herbert Walker Bush outlines the plan for a "New World Order" in his State of the Union Address and threatens military action against Iraq for their invasion of Kuwait even though Iraq had previously sought consultancy on their border dispute and was told by US Ambassador April Gillespie that they Group of pilots disputes question official version of 9/11had no opinion on the matter. Secretary of State James Baker told her to "emphasize this instruction".

9/11/01 The infamous attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon.

9/11/02 New York Pick 3 Lottery is 9-1-1 on 1 year anniversary. Chicago Mercantile Exchange's S&P futures closed at 911.00.

9/11/05 Israel officially declares an end to their 38 year occupation of Gaza.

11/9/05 Hotel Bombings in Amman, Jordan. Iraqi woman allegedly involved was previously in US custody in Iraq.

1/19/06 Bombing in Tel Aviv Israel, Israel blames Iran. CIA releases first Bin Laden tape in years.

Numbers 3, 11, 13 & 33

3 represents the holy trinity as well as the pagan trinity

There were 13 titles for the Anti-Christ in the New Testament

There were 33 Titles for the Anti-Christ in the Old Testament

Flight 93 which crashed in Shanksville, PA on 9/11 incorporates the "sacred" 9 & 3.

Flight 175 (1+7+5=13) crashed into the South Tower of the World Trade Center on 9/11. Perhaps you remember the terrorist shootdown of Pan Am Flight 103 (13).

The UN Headquarters has 39 floors

UN Logo, There are 33 segments in the globe

Israeli Supreme Court Building in Jerusalem

33 steps are in front of the Pyramid

US Dollar

3/11/03 International Criminal Court opens up shop in the Hague

3/11/04 Madrid Train Bombings (13 bombs used, though only 10 are detonated). There were 911 days between the terrorist attacks on 9/11 and the attacks in Madrid.

11/30/05 Pentagon stages "Operation Iron Hammer" (named after ww2 nazi operation) west of Baghdad. They use the 13th Expeditionary Marine Unit. They reportedly arrest 33 insurgents.

1/13/06 CIA bombs Damadola Pakistan with UAV

1/30/06 CIA releases audio tape of "Al Qaida" 2nd in command Ayman Al Zawhiri condemning the bombing of Damadola on 1/13/06

Number 77

In "Secret Mysteries of America's Beginnings", the documentarian explains that the 5 great Revolutionary War cities - New York, Baltimore, Boston, DC and Philadelphia - were built in perfect alignment with each other and the mysterious Stonehenge of Easter Island on the 77th Meridian. Note that on 9/11, 2 of these cities were attacked (New York, DC) and another (Boston) was the location of an airport (Logan) where some of the planes took off.

Also, Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11

7/7/05 London Train Bombings reportedly orchestrated by MI6 (British Intelligence) agent Haroon Rashid Aswat

7/11/06 (77) Mumbai train bombings. It only took ABC's Brian Ross 5 years to notice the 11's.

For anybody that doubts the "Al Qaida" attacks could actually be orchestrated by intelligence networks, you need to understand that the CIA, MI6 and NATO bombed dozens of trains and school buses internationally for over 30 years under the guise of leftist subversives in what was called "Operation Gladio".

The Pentagon also drafted a plan in 1962 to hijack commercial airliners via remote access, crash them and blame it on Cuba as a pretext for war with them and the Soviet Union. The entire joint chiefs of staff green-lighted the plan all the way to JFK. When he found out about it, he fired Lyman Lemnitzer, the mastermind behind the plot. It was called "Operation Northwoods".

3rd 20th 9/11 Hijacker Named

2006-08-08T02:43:00.000-07:00

When will they name the 4th 20th hijacker?

Moussaoui was the 20th hijacker!

No, Ramzi Binalshibh was the 20th hijacker!

No, Fawaz al-Nashimi was the 20th hijacker!

History Does Indeed Repeat Itself

2006-07-14T05:50:00.000-07:00

Are there good people within the CIA and FBI genuinely trying to keep Americans safe? Sure, the great majority of them are.

However, criminal elements of the intelligence agencies have in fact been called upon to engage in acts of false-flag terrorism against their own people and others in order to blame other parties and use the attacks as a pretext for tighter control or imperialism.

That means that while you call me a puppet and everyone else brain-washed, you in fact must have never read anything besides establishment propaganda regarding the US government and our allies.

Elements of the CIA, MI6 and NATO had no problem blowing up childrens' school buses in Eastern Europe in Operation Gladio.

Elements of the Pentagon agreed unanimously to engage in terrorist acts on the American people in 1962 with Operation Northwoods but were turned down by the president. Why did they bother asking? They need to take a cue from the intelligence community and do it clandestinely using others in the private sector, people whose actions and locations are not scrutinized and recorded in goverment documentation. Only then will they be as successful as our CIA has!

Not only have elements of the Israeli government had no problem killing Americans in the Lavon affair and the USS Liberty, they're more than happy just like ours, to engage in diabolical, nazi-like experiments on their own citizens which are part of the public record unbeknowest to most people, not unlike our own governments' experiments, for which the list is a mile long.

Operation Gladio was not the only series of terrorist attacks that British Intelligence has engaged in. They've got an interesting track record with regard to false-flag terrorism. Taking that into consideration, would you be surprised to know that the orchestrator of the London bombings in July of 2005 is an MI6 agent or that elements of the Spanish Security Services were connected to the Madrid bombings in March of 2004?

These attacks I've listed are only some of the many terrorist attacks our government and their allies have committed and it's a safe bet we don't know about all of them.

While most crimes in the Eastern world are overt and equally disgusting, the crimes of empires are often covert. That is to say that empires often intentionally provoke smaller power blocs or engage in crimes clandestinely in order to blame the target they wish to occupy. Power blocs that are at a disadvantage don't have as much incentive to engage in such covert attacks against themselves because being at the disadvantage they are, they don't have the same incentive to go to war.

Elements of Pakistani ISI (Inter Servicies Intelligence) appear to be very close to Al Qaida. It's been reported that they funded the 9/11 operation, at least in part.

The future CIA director was eating breakfast with alleged 9/11 money man Mahmud Ahmed on the morning of 9/11 in Washington DC.

It's not a secret that elements of Pakistani intelligence are party to terrorism against US interests so why does our government not care?

The alleged 9/11 hijackers trained at 3 US military bases. US officials knew 9/11 was coming. Some of the "hijackers" were living with FBI informants.

Nevermind the incredible of body evidence indicating that elements of our own government saw to it the conspirators were successful on 9/11. There is an equally large body of evidence indicating that elements of our own government were among the conspirators themselves.

Who planted thermate incendearies in the twin towers?

According to the FBI, they have no hard evidence linking Osama Bin Laden to 9/11. That's why 9/11 is not on his FBI website resume'.

If you're still a skeptic, do yourself a favor and watch the following film on documented and admitted false-flag terrorist acts. Take notes and research the information. You'll find that it's startlingly accurate.

Click Here to Watch Terrorstorm

1995 Card Game "Illuminati" Accurately Foretold 9/11 and Other World Events

2006-04-11T05:00:00.000-07:00

Click here to read the 5 part series on this phenomenon or scroll down to see some of the cards..

explosives in the trade center

Pentagon Attack

Establishment cream have been talking about reducing the human population to a mere 500 million for years and this was recently reiterated by highly acclaimed UT professor Eric Pianka, whose pet Buffalo is named Lucifer, interestingly enough.

God forbid someone working at the behest of others would release a biological virus as was done at with Foot & Mouth Disease at Porton Down laboratory in the UK

Bird Flu Anyone?

Combined Disasters, You mean like planes/bombs/missles?

MK ULTRA Snipers, Can you say John Mohammed and Lee Boyd Malvo? Oh yes, do your homework young Sky Walker.

You've really got to love Bush's Supreme Court Appointments and their ever so fair rulings they make on our behalf.

Katrina biatch!

There sure have been alot of earthquakes in Iran lately!

Martial Law or to put it in more politically correct terms "civil emergency!"

I feel so secure in the Homeland, don't you?

Wiretaps and Surveillance

"God told me to strike at al-Qaida (CIA-duh) and I struck them, and then He instructed me to strike at Saddam, which I did, and now I am determined to solve the problem in the Middle East." --George W. Bush

Tsunami!!!

Don't play stupid, You know what they want :)

Now for the record, I think this "phenomenon" is just a case of a man understanding the modus operandi of the Illuminati (for lack of a better word) quite well and perhaps those interests intentionally mimicking the underground conspiracy culture themes such as they did with Oklahoma City, 9/11 and the 7/7 London Bombings. There are very plausible reasons a to why they would do this.

For more information on this matter, visit my "For Your Consideration.." thread.

Agency planned exercise on Sept. 11 built around a plane crashing into a building (Associated Press)

9/11: A CIA/Mossad/ISI Operation

2006-03-13T16:19:00.000-08:00

www.911fraud.blogspot.com

9/11 Facts

Table of Contents

(I) Operational Cover

(II) Federal Foreknowledge

(III) Israel's Mossad was Involved in 9/11

(IV) Bombs were Used on 9/11

(V) The 9/11 Hijacker Story is a Fraud

(VI) Documented History of False Flag Terrorism

I. Operational Cover

Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld intentionally thwarted aerospace defense security so that 9/11 could happen.

Former Enron executive Thomas White was appointed by the Bush administration to be Secretary of the Army, and more importantly the executive agent for the Department of Defense on July 31st, 2001.

The very next day on June 1st 2001, White radically altered existing DOD protocols and issued a new directive placing all decision-making powers, specifically in the case of 'Derelict Airborne Objects', under the control of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.

This document removed the authority of well intentioned Generals and field officers to shoot down hijacked aircraft and gave the authority strictly to Donald Rumsfeld, the man who is documented as needing a "catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a New Pearl Harbor" in order to justify "aggressive increases in military spending" that would allow them to "stage multiple and simultaneous theater wars" in the middle east as other documents on their website state.

They run drills while real attacks are occuring in order to distract well meaning authorities who are not in on their plot and if they get caught in the real plot, they can say "it's just a drill."

The CIA and NORAD were running 4 joint aerospace defense drills (northern guardian, northern vigilance, vigiliant guardian, vigilant warrior) themed around hijacked jets wrecking into buildings just as "hijacked" jets were wrecking into buildings on the morning of 9/11. [Associated Press, USA Today, "Against all Enemies", Congressional Session]

Scotland Yard was running bombing drills in the London Underground themed around simultaneously detonated explosives just as simultaneously detonated explosives went off in the London Underground.

Following a wave of apartment bombings that swept across Russia in 1999 which were blamed on Chechen separatists, President Vladimir Putin's FSB was caught trying to blow up an apartment building in Ryazan with hexagen explosives and upon being caught claimed it was a drill. Of course, nobody was prosecuted.

It was actually no secret that our government was going to use George Herbert Walker Bush's CIA asset Osama Bin Laden to attack New York. There were people running around with their hair on fire weeks in advance, telling others to call the White House and beg them not to go through with it.

II. Federal Foreknowledge

Although much of the admitted foreknowlege of terrorist events on and since 9/11 is of Israeli origin, the following section is not meant to be anti-Semitic by any means. Most of the well-respected publications that initially reported on these matters were in fact Israeli publications. Certainly there is evidence to demonstrate that US and British foreknowledge and/or involvement in terrorist attacks on and since 9/11 does exist.

*Several workers from Odigo, an Israeli instant messaging company that had offices in the World Trade Center towers, were warned to get out of the building prior to the attacks on the morning of 9/11.

*Former Israeli Prime Minsiter Benjamin Netanyahu, who is rumored to be eyeing that position once again due to Ariel Sharon's ill health, was in London for the G8 economic summit on the morning of the London Bombings when he was reportedly warned in advance of the pending attacks since he was staying in a hotel adjacent to the London Underground train station.

*Following the hotel bombings in Amman Jordan on 11/9/05, it was reported in Haaretz, an Israeli publication, that Israeli officials were warned in advance to get out of the buildings. If this were the case, the question begs to be asked just as with 9/11 and the London Bombings, why were Israelis given exclusive treatment while others were not warned? Haaretz has since retracted this claim.

III. Israeli Mossad Involved in 9/11

IV. Evidence of Explosives

These are controlled demolitions of buildings using demolition charges..

Here are the squibs in the twin towers. You may note that the squibs appear smaller than those in the buildings above. This is not the case. The twin towers were just much larger structures. They were almost a quarter mile tall so the squibs appear small in comparison to the buildings.

The squibs were evenly placed all the way down the building. Watch the 2nd video down.

This is world trade center building 7 collapsing at 5:30 pm on 9/11. It was not even hit by a plane.

Larry Silverstein, the leaseholder of the building later admitted in a PBS documentary that they "pulled" building 7, a demoltion term for controlled demolition, even though it takes at least days to plant charges and there were small fires in the lower section of the building when it fell. They couldn't have moved explosives in before they put the fires out.

Here is a close up video of world trade center building 7's collapse in which you can see unmistakable evidence of demolition charges going off.

V. Hijacker Story was a Fraud

The alleged "hijackers" are still alive and living abroad according to the BBC, LA Times, London Independent, London Telegraph, Cairo Times and Saudi Gazette.

The arabs aboad the planes were unwitting patsies. I propose they were drug traffickers which would explain Atta's coke habit, Florida's record seizure of heroin at his flight school the week he enrolled and the fact that they were taking lessons to fly cessnas in the first place.

They were clearly federal agents of some sort seeing as they were taking lessons at secured US military installations (1, 2, 3) and living with federal officials. It was alleged by FBI Agent Robert Wright that the agency protects suspected terrorists.

The alleged cellular phone calls were impossible and the conversations were ridiculous.

According to press reports, Mark Bingham said to his mother "Mom, this is Mark Bingham". When was the last time you identified yourself to a family member with your first and last name? The party who identified himself as Mark Bingham went out of his way to describe the parties carrying out the attack and their means of doing so (that they had a bomb). If he knew the reason for his call was to say goodbye to his mother prior to crashing the plane to avoid another attack, what purpose did it serve other than to establish the "true account" of 9/11 by going into more detail than "I love you mom"? Other cell phone calls show the same pattern of careful description of what was going on and what they were about to do. This behavior is more consistent w/ establishing an official account than a final call to loved ones. Some of the final alleged cell phone calls are to absurd parties, like Todd Beamer's call to a Verizon tech. He allegly spoke for close to thirty minutes with her. If the cell phone worked why speak to an unknown stranger rather than a loved one other than the concern that a loved one would, despite the noise and hysterics recognize that it was not their dad/brother/husband on the phone?

The technology is available to fake such things and we have to ask ourselves why the alleged box cutters, not even the voice/data recorders, 6 of which were among the 2 planes that hit the world trade center and pentagon, which is first in world history. They were however able to find 2 paper passports that escaped hundred yard fireballs in the world trade center impacts. I cover this issue here on my blog.

VI. CIA/Mossad/MI6 History of False-Flag Terrorism

[CIA (1, 2) Mossad (1, 2) and MI6 (1)]

Watch These Now!

911:The Road to Tyranny

The dark forces of Global Government are funding, training and protecting terrorist groups worldwide. In this blockbuster which has gained worldwide prestige you will learn the origins and the true story behind 9/11.

Masters of Terror

In this powerful expose, Jones explains why the elite are using manufactured terrorism to coerce the masses into willingly volunteering their own enslavement.

Loose Change 2nd Edition (Part 1)

Loose Change 2nd Edition (Part 2)

Loose Change 2nd Edition (Part 3)

"Loose Change 2nd Edition" is the follow-up to the most provocative 9-11 documentary on the market today. This film shows direct connection between the attacks of September 11, 2001 and the United States government. Evidence is derived from news footage, scientific fact, and most important, Americans who suffered through that tragic day.

www.prisonplanet.com

www.whatreallyhappened.com

www.kurtnimmo.com

www.globalresearch.ca

It's All in the Family: The Bushes and 9/11

2006-03-13T04:39:00.000-08:00

Meet Marvin Bush, the Man in charge of Securacom, the company that ran security for the World Trade Center and United Airlines.

Meet Governor of Florida Jeb Bush, who filed for executive police state powers on September 7th 2001, just four days before 9/11.

Meet Jonathan Bush, whose Riggs bank was fined a record breaking 25 million dollars for laundering terrorist funds.

..and the next time you see George Herbert Walker Bush, ask him if he enjoyed his breakfast with Shafig Bin Laden on the morning of 9/11 at the Ritz Carlton Hotel in New York.

Machinations of False-Flag Terrorism by the War on Terror Coalition or Merely an Unflattering Series of Coincidences?

2006-02-26T18:24:00.000-08:00

Introduction

What I'm going to address has to do with the state of affairs in the world right now and events on the horizon as they relate to a few seemingly insignificant and unrelated events in recent history. I believe that the most appropriate place for me to start would be the issue that stimulated a series of connections I was recently able to make, however absurd you may think they are. I will use variations of the word "allege" in this thread more than once since we cannot yet be sure that the events we will discuss are in fact as they are being reported. I just ask that you read the following information with an open mind and make a determination after reviewing the validity of what I'm going to provide herein.

Jill Carroll, a US journalist working for the Christian Science Monitor was on report in Iraq when she was allegedly kidnapped by a militant Islamic group called the "Brigades of Vengeance" on January 7th, 2006. She has been forced to state in video releases that she will be killed in the event that coalition forces do not meet demands to release Iraqi women who have been kidnapped by the coalition and are being used as leverage against accused Iraqi insurgents.

A couple of weeks ago, Jill's captors extended her stay of execution to February 26th, 2006, in other words today. The 20th Olympic Winter Games' closing ceremonies commenced at 2:00 PM earlier and today is also the 13th anniversary of the initial World Trade Center bombing in 1993 which the FBI played an interesting role in, as covered by the New York Times.

The thought of Jill's pending execution at the hands of terrorists reminds me of other executions under similar circustances that have resulted since the US led invasion of Iraq in 2003. One in particular is Nicholas Berg who was in Iraq allegedly seeking telecommunications work for his private business Prometheus Methods Tower Service. A number of mysterious circumstanes surround Nicholas Berg, his business venture in Iraq and alleged consequent execution by Islamic extremists in Iraq in May of 2004.

(1)
(2)

Following his execution (1), it was reported by CNN that while taking a course on a remote campus of the University of Oklahoma in 1999, Berg shared an interesting encounter with Zaccarias Moussaoui (2) who was alleged to have been involved in the conspiracy to execute the string of 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington DC that we are all familiar with. Berg shared his laptop computer with Moussaoui on a bus and Moussaoui was later reported to have used Berg's account password.

Proposed Machinations of Western Involvement in False-Flag Terrorism

I. Convenient Survival

Zacarias Moussaoui was alleged to have been preparing to execute the 9/11 attacks with the other 19 alleged hijackers but was unable to receive a visa for travel to the US, consequently providing a living, breathing human element to the attacks who could be prosecuted for his involvement, thus effectively blowing a hole in alternative theories as to who was really behind the attacks in 2001.

Similarly, following the hotel bombings in Amman Jordan on 11/9/05, the inverse of 9/11, one of the alleged bombers, a female Iraqi citizen, was also was unable to go through with the attack, again providing a living, breathing human element who could be used to demonstrate the reality of this threat on Jordanian national television, scaring their population into accepting further erosion of rights under their already despotic police state but more importantly, covered by the international media to demonstrate that Iraq is indeed exporting terrorism and should continue to be occupied by coalition forces now preparing to launch an attack on neighboring Iran. Let's call this phenomenon of terrorists surviving to be used as propaganda "convenient survival", a phenomenon that will be listed among other phenomena in the summation of this thread.

II. Controlled Transfer

Another parallel, which is shared between Safaa Mohammed Ali, the alleged would-be female Iraqi suicide bomber and Nicholas Berg, the private business owner who shared a connection with would-be 9/11 terrorist Zacarias Moussaoui, is that they were both in US custody prior to their having been allegedly preyed upon by Al Qaida which was the name of the CIA's database of Mujahideen fighters resisting the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in the 1980s for which Osama Bin Laden was the leader. According to the CIA, Bin Laden only began referring to his network of Jihaddists as Al Qaida after the 9/11 attacks in 2001 but that is a side issue.

Safaa Mohammed Ali, the female Iraqi would-be suicide bomber was in US custody prior to allegedly joining Al Qaida and Nicholas Berg, associate of alleged 9/11 terrorist Zacarias Moussaoui and consequent Al Qaida victim in Iraq, was in US custody just prior to his alleged capture by Al Qaida. We will call this phenomenon of people in US custody being released into the jaws of Al Qaida and consequently ending up on your television screen to demonstrate the depravity of Al Qaida, "controlled transfer".

III. Documented False-Flag History

There is a wide array of material which raises questions regarding the alleged capture and execution of Nicholas Berg by Al Qaida operatives, mostly alleging the involvement of western interests. Would this be surprising, considering the fact that US, British and Israeli Intelligence has a documented history of not only involvement with militant Islamic organizations but actually attacking their own citzenry [CIA (I, II) Mossad (I, II) and MI6 (I)] under the guise of such foreign enemies as a pretext to engage them militarily for financial and imperial aims? This practice is called "false-flag terrorism".

Nicholas Berg's mysterious involvement with alleged would-be 9/11 terrorist Zacarias Moussaoui and his presence as a civilian in a warzone (Iraq) does indicate that he could have been an agent of some sort, having prior knowledge and/or of setting up alleged 9/11 patsy Zacarias Moussaoui and conducting operations in Iraq under the guise of official business for his telecommunications company for which there is strangely, no records whatsoever.

Is it possible that because Nicholas Berg may have known too much about 9/11, perhaps that it was indeed a black-operation conducted by Western interests, that he was delivered into the hands of Muslim jihaddists unwittingly working on behalf of Western interests not unlike MI6 agent Haroon Rashid Aswat (London Bombings), "former" CIA asset Osama Bin Laden (9/11), the orchestrators of the Madrid Train Bombings in 2004 as well as Mossad operatives in Palestine or even that Berg wasn't killed at all as some allege and that his execution was only a staged video production that would enable him to assume a new identity and render his association with Moussaoui irrelevant?

IV. Occult Ritualism

Now why is US journalist Jill Carroll's pending execution by the "Brigades of Vengeance" relevant in all of this? If you've already scoffed at the notions of western involvement in the harm of their own citizens which is quite plausible given their own admitted history of false-flag operations, certainly you're only going to find my following deviation from established norms into the realm of alleged occult ritualism even more difficult to believe. However I believe there is enough evidence to establish this phenomenon as very real as well.

Let me first give you a brief history of this alleged "occult ritualism" (secret ritualism) before I demonstrate how it relates to the Jill Carroll ordeal. If you find the notion that the world's political hierarchy would engage in such activity that myself and others have documented that has been called "chicanery", then I would ask that you skip ahead to section V, Operational Cover.

(1)
(2)

The US Government and it's allies, the UK and Israel, have a documented history of Occult Architecture both in their physical and social infrastructure. In Washington DC (1) and London (2), you have the Obelisk which goes back to ancient Babylon and is a symbol of male virility representing Phallaus of Osiris (no joke) whereas the female sexual organ, the ovum, is depicted in the architecture of the White House itself, the Oval Office.

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)

The Pentagon is essentially the center of the Pentagram (1) and is prevalent in the street design of Washington DC itself (2). The ancient pyramid with illuminated eye of Horus (ancient architectural structure) on the back of the US Dollar Bill (3) is the very same struture that sits atop Israel's supreme court building (4) with 33 steps in front of it, the number of the Supreme Masonic Degree for which "Ordo ab Chao" (Order out of Chaos) (5) is the mantra.

But the aspect of occult ritualism I'm briefly going to address here, is occult numerology. Some time after 9/11, I became aware of allegations that not only was 9/11 an inside job but that ritualistic events, namely the execution of terrorist and military operations were being conducted on dates of occult numerological significance and that specific aspects of the events were also executed according to such numbers. I was already aware of the fact that Adolf Hitler waged his military campaigns according to occultism, as he was involved with many occult organizations not unlike our own political hierarchy throughout the world today.

So I began to study recent events and noticed patterns and relationships between alleged Al Qaida (The Base) attacks and attacks conducted by established governments across the world, namely by the Pentagon (The Base) in the War on Terror, now renamed in classic Orwellian Newspeak as "The Long War".

A handful of numbers keep presenting themselves in these attacks and other ritualistic events over and over again. For an interpretation of these numbers' meanings, click here. It is important to note that zeros (0) have no numerological significance and that a number's inverse - eg. 13/31, 39/93, 911/119 - is designated the same sacred value.

The numbers/inverses I'm going to address are as follows:

11
13/31
33
39/93
77
911/119
311/113

(911) 9/11/41, Ground Breaking Ceremony for the Pentagon

(911) 9/11/90, George Herbert Walker Bush declares the New World Order

(113 & 93) 2/26/93 (113 x 2 = 226), Initial World Trade Center bombing, FBI involvement

(11, 13, 39 inverse, 77, 911) 9/11/01, World Trade Center/Pentagon attacks, Bin Laden CIA
Flights 11, 77, 93 and 175 [1+7+5=13] are used in the attacks

(311, 13, 911) 3/11/04, Madrid Spain bombings, bombers linked to Spanish Security Services
911 days between 9/11 and this date
13 bombs used in the attack

(77) 7/7/05, London England bombings, same number as flight (77) in 9/11 attack on Pentagon, Haroon Rashid Aswat MI6 agent

(11) 10/1/05, Bali Indonesia bombings

(911 inverse) 11/9/05, Amman Jordan bombings, US connection

(13, 33, 311 inverse) 11/30/05, Operation Iron Hammer (named after WW2 Nazi campaign)
13th expeditionary Unit used
33 insurgents reportedly arrested

(13, 13 inverse) 12/13/05, 1/31/06, Alan Greenspan raises interst rates for 13th consecutive time on December 13th, Schedules next fed meeting, his last for January 31st the following month

(311 inverse) 1/13/06, Damadola Pakistan bombing raid by CIA

(911 inverse) 1/19/06, Tel Aviv bombing, CIA releases first "Bin Laden" audio tape in years

(13) CIA releases audio tape of "Al Qaida" 2nd in command Ayman Al Zawhiri condemning the bombing of Damadola on 1/13/06 (13)

..and now the Jill Carroll Connection..

(13, 33, 39, 113) 2/26/06 (113 x 2 = 226), Jill Carroll [J=10 + C=3 is 13] set to be executed by the Brigades of Vengeance (B=2 + O=15 + V=22 is 39) on the 13th anniversary of the initial World Trade Center bombing.

Just like 13 bombs being used in the Madrid Train Bombings (a date which translates to 13) and the 13th Expeditionary Marine Unit being used in Operation Iron Hammer (a date which translates to 13), Jill Carroll, whose initials translate to 13 is set to be used today, a date which translates to 13.

V. Operational Cover

The CIA and NORAD were running 4 joint aerospace defense drills (northern guardian, northern vigilance, vigiliant guardian, vigilant warrior) themed around hijacked jets wrecking into buildings just as "hijacked" jets were wrecking into buildings on the morning of 9/11. [Associated Press, USA Today, "Against all Enemies", Congressional Session]

Scotland Yard was running bombing drills in the London Underground themed around simultaneously detonated explosives just as simultaneously detonated explosives went off in the London Underground.

Following a wave of apartment bombings that swept across Russia in 1999 which were blamed on Chechen separatists, President Vladimir Putin's FSB was caught trying to blow up an apartment building in Ryazan with hexagen explosives and upon being caught claimed it was a drill. Of course, nobody was prosecuted.

Is it possible that these drills are "operational cover", that in the case of 9/11 they were used as a distraction and in the case of London and Ryazan, were used to give federal agents plausible deniability in the event that they were caught?

VI. Federal Foreknowledge

Although much of the admitted foreknowlege of terrorist events on and since 9/11 is of Israeli origin, the following section is not meant to be anti-Semitic by any means. Most of the well-respected publications that initially reported on these matters were in fact Israeli publications. Certainly there is evidence to demonstrate that US and British foreknowledge and/or involvement in terrorist attacks on and since 9/11 does exist.

-Several workers from Odigo, an Israeli instant messaging company that had offices in the World Trade Center towers, were warned to get out of the building prior to the attacks on the morning of 9/11.

-Former Israeli Prime Minsiter Benjamin Netanyahu, who is rumored to be eyeing that position once again due to Ariel Sharon's ill health, was in London for the G8 economic summit on the morning of the London Bombings when he was reportedly warned in advance of the pending attacks since he was staying in a hotel adjacent to the London Underground train station.

-Following the hotel bombings in Amman Jordan on 11/9/05, it was reported in Haaretz, an Israeli publication, that Israeli officials were warned in advance to get out of the buildings. If this were the case, the question begs to be asked just as with 9/11 and the London Bombings, why were Israelis given exclusive treatment while others were not warned? Haaretz has since retracted this claim.

Closing

Are the identifiable parallels of the War on Terror coalition's seemingly self-incriminating actions relative to many of the terrorist attacks since 9/11, the hundreds of other unflattering pieces of evidence, their admitted history of engaging in false-flag activity as a pretext to go to war with smaller nations as well as false-flag terrorism being a documented hallmark of every empire at least as far back as ancient Rome, not enough to make you question the validity of the official version of events were are presented with on a daily basis internationally?

If you believe it is enough, it is your obligation as a citizen of your nation and as a human being, to be wary of your government's motives from this point forward, regardless of which nation you reside. Tyranny has been the demise of every nation in the history of the world either directly or indirectly. We are now at a turning point in history. Do not contribute to the mindlessness. Do not let history repeat itself if you have anything to say about it.

Newly Uncovered Video Evidence Indicates Thermite Used to Melt Twin Towers' Steel

2006-02-15T04:38:00.000-08:00

If you're a 9/11 coincidence theorist, this is where you might want to close your eyes, plug your ears and scream real loud.

This is a conventional fire..

This is a thermite reaction..

Steel has a melting point of 2500 degrees. Before 9/11, a steel structured building had never fallen from fire damage. On 9/11, three such buildings allegedly fell from fire damage.

Here is all the proof you need that conventional fire cannot melt steel..

Watch this video of thermite melting through a car's engine block. Note the almost lava-like effect. Thermite is part iron oxide (powder) so when it's ignited, you essentially have liquid metal.

Now watch this video footage of what looks like thermite pouring out of a wound in the South Tower of the World Trade Center. Note the distinct difference between it and the larger conventional fire to it's above left. If this were an electrical fire, the sparks would fizzle out almost immediately but they don't. The fire burns intensely and incessantly as what appear to be sparks or droplets of liquid metal fall far and away from it, still burning an almost white color, indicating that the fuel source is not used up. It looks as if it's raining lava.

More than likely, the thermite was used to soften the steel columns enough so that a small and discreet amount of explosive material would be sufficient to bring down the towers. Had the demolition sequence been executed without thermite, heavier explosives would have been necessary to bring down the buildings and would have resulted in obvious explosions. Yet as you will see below, squibs (lateral explosions) were still clearly visible.

9/11 is the Achilles Heel, Expose it and Cause a Mass Exodus

2006-01-14T10:22:00.000-08:00

9/11 is the Achilles Heel of the ever growing imperial empire and future police state enslavement of us all. It's time we expose it.

Easier said than done you say. How do we do it? Most of us who have been presented with the notion that 9/11 was not a product of Al Qaida, that it was at least partially an inside job and are not so afraid of the implications that we deny ourselves the truth, have calmly looked at the facts and come to the conclusion that 9/11 could not have possibly gone down as the federal government has told us.

I've found that nothing we can say or do seems to convince those who support our federal government's current course of action at home and abroad, that 9/11 was orchestrated and executed by interests connected to our own government.

Entertaining such notions will ensure that you're immediately branded as a left-wing nut or a shameless liberal who will stop at nothing to take down a republican president.

Is there not at least some truth in that statement which prevents those partisans on the side of the Bush administration from entertaining our notions and thus jeopardizing our cause? I've found that most of the people who are well versed on the events of 9/11 and understand very well that the government's version of events is an extraordinary lie, aren't the least bit aware that there is an incredible body of evidence - possibly even larger than that of 9/11 - that our federal government was involved in the Oklahoma City Bombing in 1995.

First we must understand that the federal government is not a product of any one party and that party affiliation is largely a mechanism which only comes into play when the cameras are rolling in order to galvanize us to support one half of the same machine. The left and right wings belong to the same demon.

George Bush did not orchestrate or execute 9/11. Bill Clinton did on orchestrate or execute the Oklahoma City bombing. Al Qaida did not execute the events of 9/11 and Timothy Mc Veigh didn't execute the Oklahoma City Bombing.

If you believe 9/11 was an inside job and are not willing to hold the federal government to account for crimes committed during a democratic president, you're the last person that someone who supports a republican president is ever going to listen to.

Only after learning that 9/11 was an inside job was I able to begin entertaining the notion that the Oklahoma City bombing was also an inside job. Those who favor the Bush administration over the Clinton administration would probably be willing to entertain the notion that the federal government under Bill Clinton was involved in the attack on the Alfred P. Murrah Building in Oklahoma City long before they would entertain the notion that our federal government under George W. Bush was involved in the 9/11 attacks.

In short, if you can open their minds to the reality of false-flag terrorism by demonstrating how the federal government stood to benefit from the Oklahoma City bombing and the evidence which proves they were involved, you will have planted the seed. It will demonstrate that you are not a partisan hack shamelessly lying to take down George Bush by suggesting 9/11 was an inside job.

No matter how sick to your stomach it makes you, by demonstrating that you share something with those who support the Bush administration by scrutinizing the federal government on Clinton's watch, they will likely put their guard down and leave their Achilles Heel (9/11) unprotected.

Only then will we be able to expose 9/11 to the government's most ardent supporters. If you can convince those people that 9/11 was an inside job, then it very well may be over for criminal despots everywhere who are seeking to construct their so-called "new world order", the same new world order Pope Benedictine XVI recently called for.

Here are the weapons which will allow you to destroy the shield, the mental block which prevents those who support the federal government, from coming to the realization that 9/11 was an inside job.

Hit reply on this bulletin. Then cut and paste the following code into a bulletin of your own. Send it in messages to people you know who would never entertain the notion that 9/11 was an inside job..

-conservative libertarian Alex Jones exposing the Waco Massacre

-Alex Jones exposing federal involvement in the Oklahoma City bombing and the New World Order plan

-Alex Jones exposing federal involvement in the Oklahoma City bombing and 9/11

-Alex Jones closing the case on federal involvement in 9/11 (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3)

Controlled Demolition of the Towers

2005-12-04T08:45:00.000-08:00

A steel structured building had never fallen from fire damage in the history of the world until 9/11/01, upon which 3 buildings-2 of them struck by aircraft and 1 of which was several blocks away and NOT struck by aircraft-supposedly fell from fire damage and in pefect formation. All of them, even building 7 which was not struck by aircraft, fell in perfect formation.

The conspiracy theorists can argue their lame pancake collapse of the twin towers which fell at pure freefall speed, basically like a hot knife through butter, even through the dozens of floors below the point of impact where there were NO FIRES to compromise the 47 massive steel collumns.

Even entertaining their absurd notion that kerosine jet fuel burned at blowtorch temperatures (blue flames), I still can't see how the point of impact and ensuing fires could have torn through the uncompromised part of the building below, especially the steel collumns. I could even kick the top of a sand castle off, which is just a bunch of individual grains of sand held together with water, and the uncompromised bottom half will still stand.

You do know that the 47 central steel collumns of the world trade center were positioned vertically, right?

-There were 425,000 cubic yards of concrete in the world trade center.

-There's 435 lbs in a cubic yard of concrete.

-That's 184,875,000 lbs, which divided by 2,000 (1 ton=2,000 lbs), is 92,438 tons of concrete.

-I'll even throw in the 300,000 lb boeing aircraft which is 150 tons.

-That's 92,588 tons of material between the aircraft and the concrete.

Now onto the steel..

-There were 200,000 tons of steel in the world trade center.

That's more than 2 tons of steel to every 1 ton of concrete pal, and do you know how dense steel is? You could move a wheel barrow of concrete but a wheel barrow of steel, well.. a wheel barrow couldn't hold steel of the same density without collapsing and if it could, you couldn't move it.

What I'm getting at is this. Imagine the density of 47 massive steel collumns running vertically through the world trade center. How in the hell could half it's weight in concrete, dispersed over a much wider area (less density), break those steel collumns? Most of the concrete weight would be falling around the steel, not on top of the steel.

And I just love that theory about how the impact of the planes knocked off all the fireproofing, leaving the building vulnerable to the fires. Still, what about building 7 and it's perfect freefall collapse on it's footprint?

I suggest you come up with a better theory. How about this one?

The flames were actually blue and white indicating temperatures hot enough to melt steel, not orange and yellow. It's that damn liberal media at the studios, tampering with the color of the film to indicate that the fires were shades of red like the fires in Madrid Spain and Caracas Venezuela.

Neither of those buildings fell. The media was on television saying the windsor building in Madrid Spain was going to fall because the world trade center did. Haha. It didn't. Why in the hell would it? The entire buidling burned to nothing. Even the millions of pounds of concrete collapsed and couldn't bring down the steel skeleton of the building. They had to move in demolition charges to take it down. Watch the videos

Then there's the B25bomber that wrecked into the empire state building in 1949. The empire state building was engineered to withstand the impact of a 10 ton aircraft. The B25bomber has a maximum capacity of 40,000lbs. That's 20 tons. It took a direct hit and stood burning for hours.

The world trade center architects built the world trade centers to withstand multiple jumbo jet impacts. Remember that fake videotape where CIA agent Bin Laden whose codename was Tim Osman (documented), when he toured US military installations owned by his and the Bush family through the Carlyle Group, said that he couldn't believe the towers came down?

Why couldn't he believe it when they orchestrated such an elaborate plan when they could have done something just as effective without the risk of getting caught? 130lb Muslims hijack 4 planes, one with a 6'2'' 230 Viet Nam Vet for a pilot and not a single flight was able to execute their disress signal? I mean, the fed informants' truck bomb would have blown up the towers in 1993 had they parked it against the main support collumn. Why go to all that trouble with the planes? They didn't. It was an elaborate hoax to scare the entirety of americans whenever they saw a commercial airliner above them. They needed to enstill fear in the masses, not just New Yorkers if they wanted broad support for their massive war on terror. They needed it on videotape from multiple angles too.

The largest seizure of cocaine in Florida history was at the flight school Muhammed Atta was taking lessons, the week he was taking them. Notice the close connections with the democrats too. The elite orchestrators made sure both parties were involved so they could put the criminals on a bipartisan commission if they had to, criminals who didn't want to get to the bottom of 9/11 because they themselves were involved. Most of the alleged hijackers had already gotten flight certificiation but had to practice flying with an instructor before they could rent their cessna aircraft. Notice how they were cokeheads? Those guys were probably trafficking cocaine in those planes, which explains the drug seizure. If they were federal drug smugglers, that would explain how they were able to take lessons at Pensacola Naval Airstation years before, which is a military installation. They probably had credit cards paid for by the government's black budget and were told to buy tickets weeks in advance of 9/11 to go God knows where on official business, when criminal members of our government double crossed them for the stupid patsies they are and using Global Hawk remmote access software, wrecked the planes with the "hijackers" on it, which was perfect since they had a record of having taken flight lessons. They were the perfect patsies, with no connection to Osama Bin Laden.

If you don't think our governemnt could do such a thing, you just don't know our government. Out of 19 "hijackers", not a single one of them wrote a suicide note, will or manifesto against the "Great Satan". We're just supposed to believe a general admission of guilt from a man who may or may not be Bin Laden, a man who "used to" work for the CIA.
Even the London Bomber works for MI6 (British) intelligence. Now do you see how they do it? They proposition persuasive slicksters like Aswat and Bin Laden to coax useful idiot jihaddists into blowing themselves up for Allah, not even realizing their boss is working for the western world and is now somewhere in the lap of luxury drinking pina coladas while our government has military intelligence running around Islamabad looking for him like stupid bloodhounds. Useful idiots on both sides, getting played for fools while the elite establishement on both sides has a gentlemen's agreement to orchestrate provoactions which will justify setting up a world government.

9/11 however was a different story. The incompetent pilots couldn't have executed the maneuvers those planes did, even if they were lucky enough to get the box cutters on the planes and taken out the crew and ex nam vet pilots blades as thin as posterboard. Remote access software for flying commercial airliners on the ground has been available for decades. Even the alleged cellular phone calls from passengers were a fraud. Qualcomm said they're now setting up the wireless infrastructure to allow cellular phone calls on commercial airliners by 2006. It was then, that independent studies were done to see if the calls could have been made at various differenet altitudes. It's not impossible, but highly implausible.

Then what about all the reports from firefighters, witnesses, and news media on the scene saying bombs were going off? There's quite a bit of evidence that there was ample opportunity to get explosives into the buildings and the guys who did it were probably offed by their superiors just to make sure they wouldn't be around to plea bargain and implicate anybody else if there were ever a serious investigation. The only people who are still around to tell about it, are the elite orchestrators like Cheney, Rumsfeld and others.

There's thousands of pieces of evidence indicating our government was involved.

Occultism in Government: From Nazi Germany to Neocon USA

2005-12-01T03:03:00.000-08:00

Adolf Hitler was obsessed with the occult. All of his military actions were launched according to occult numerology. In occult numerology, certain numbers are believed to posess power and orchestrating events methodically, ritualistically using such numbers, is believed to bring the orchestrator success.

The numbers
3
6
7
9
11
13
18
28
33
39
77
and
666 are considered "sacred" or "magical" in occult circles. Inverses of these numbers, for example 13=31, 18=81, 39=93 and even 666 because upside down it is 999, are also considered "sacred" or "magical".

It is also believed in such circles, that if you multiply one sacred number with another, you get an exponentially more sacred number.

In occult numerology, "0" is disregarded. For example the number "10" is seen as 1 and the number "110" is seen as 11. Pan Am Flight 103 (13) was blown up on 12/21/88.

On 9/11/41, they ceremonially broke ground to build the Pentagon.

On 9/11/90, 49 (7x7) years later, president George Herbert Walker Bush announced the New World Order.

Eleven years later to the day, on 9/11/01, you know what happened.

Flight 11 [occult]
Flight 77 [occult]
Flight 93 [occult]
and

Flight 175 (1+7+5=13) [occult?]

..all hit their designated targets except for the orchestrators' lucky 93.

The next day, CFR president Gary Hart said there was a chance for president Bush to "use this event to usher in the New World Order."

911 (9/11) days later, on 3/11/04 (3x11=33) [occult], you have the train bombings in Madrid Spain. 33 is the Masonic supreme degree of Ordo Ab Chao, which actually means order out of chaos in Latin, precisely the concept Gary Hart was discussing when he said we could get the New World Order out of the chaos which was 9/11.

13 bombs were set in Madrid but only 10 were detonated. Authorities aprehended 13 suspects.

On 7/7/05 (77) [occult again, just like Flight 77 on 9/11], Haroon Rashid Aswat, an MI6 (British Intelligence) agent found a few useful idiots to blow themselves up in the London Underground so the imperial interests (weapon/oil/infrastructure contractors) who own most but not yet all of the world's governments, could again point to the barbarism of Muslim exremism as an excuse for continuing to stick pillage us, spending all of our blood, sweat and tears in the form of tax dollars and troops by continuing to occupy Iraq and serve their larger agenda of destroying the US dollar and consequently setting up a one-world, cashless currency.

Now do you see how they do it? They have their persuasive agents hire naive patsies. I believe it's noble to serve in the military. It's just a shame they're using you in a scheme to financially rape, pillage and eventually kill us all.

On 10/1/05 (11) [occult], Bali Indonesia was struck again.

39 [occult] days later they struck Amman Jordan using Iraqis, one of which was a woman they had previously arrested and released, typical M.O. for a black op. They had the woman parading around in a bomb belt at a national news conference in Jordan saying how she's an Iraqi, which is so politically expedient for the imperial intere$t in staying there and you think that the phantom menace Zarqawi did it? Why were they parading this woman around for the Jordanian citizenry? It was propaganda for the profitable Police $tate they are going to set up now. Oh yeah, they've got a Patriot Act like we do now! Now they're $uper Patriot$!

Do you know how profitiable a pork barrel police state is? It gives your government the license to spend a lot of YOUR money to "protect you". It should be noted that after Adolf Hitler's storm troopers burnt down Germany's Reichstag parliament building, they rolled out the "Enabling Act" real fast. Almost as fast as our government rolled out the Patriot Act. Put the Patriot Act and Enabling Act side by side and see how many hours it takes you to find a difference in them. Hitler blamed Poland for the terrorist attack and invaded them almost as fast as our government blamed 9/11 on every nation they wanted to build a pipeline through.

Yesterday was 11/30/05 [occult]. Like the 11/9 Jordan bombings were the inverse of the 9/11 attacks, the inverse of the 3/11 Madrid bombings would be the inverse of whatever would have happened on 11/30 (yesterday), had they chosen to use it.

Maybe I'm just grasping for straws, but the Pentagon (pentagram) did initiate a new anti-insurgency offensive in Western Iraq yesterday, which would have been exactly how Hitler would have done it, the timing I mean, not the execution. They're using the 13th [occult] Expeditionary Unit to execute it and now I see that one of their Associated Press spooks SAID they rounded up 33 [occult] suspected insurgents. Sheesh.

You can just go back to sleep though. There isn't mountains upon mountains of evidence to implicate our government in the 9/11 attacks, specifically Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld and there isn't a larger agenda to set up a world dictatorship run by the European Union, the United Nations and the American (Canada, US, Mexico, South America) and Asian Unions which are soon coming.

Ask Yourself..

2005-11-20T15:14:00.000-08:00

I don't even challenge the believers of our federal government's official version of 9/11 events to answer the difficult questions. While they are assembling their logically fallacious rebuttals to the bulletin, I'll ask one simple question following a couple of brief points.

(1) Several members of the Bush administration all stated on the record that nobody in the federal government had ever conceived of a plan to fly hijacked jets into the world trade center and pentagon before 9/11, so I'll be fair and not say they lied but that they were intentionally misleading since it's long been a part of the official record that the CIA and NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) were running aerospace defense drills based on the concept of hijacked jets being wrecked into targets none other than the world trade center and pentagon, not only on the very morning of 9/11 (Associated Press) but several times in the weeks and months beforehand.

(2) Our federal government has waged psychological warfare campaigns on us before (see McCollum memos[ww2], pretext for Vietnam War, pretext for Iraq War), has drawn up plans to kill US citizens as a pretext for war with other nations (Operation Northwoods) and actually carried out plans to kill innocent civilians as a pretext for setting up more draconian law enforcement measures (Operation Gladio). There is even a legitamate argument that Franklin Delano Roosevelt knew of the Pearl Harbor attack at least days in advance and took measures to see that it was not prevented. Their motive for doing so is clear when you actually read the McCollum memos which have now been released through the FOIA (Freedom of Information Act).

My question is this:

Considering the fact that high ranking officials with military authority in the Bush administration stated in a document written at least a year before 9/11 and before they were even members of his administration that a "catastrophic, catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor" would be conducive to their agenda, which was to "fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars", and the fact that their administration has been (1)intentionally misleading with respect to other matters, do you not believe that officials with aerospace defense, intelligence, and other security oriented authority would not *consider* looking the other way, dismantling security measures (1, 2), aiding a terrorist threat or even orchestating a terrorist act like 9/11 (WMP)?

Titanium Passports?

2005-07-29T21:46:00.000-07:00

According to the US government's offical version of events on 9/11, none of the 4 black boxes(generic term for cockpit voice and data recorders) from each of the 2 planes that hit the world trade center towers, were ever recovered from the debris. What is interesting about this claim, is that this was the first time in history that a so-called "black box" was not recovered from a conventional plane crash. Well it must have been the jet fuel that melted them, right? After all, that was the excuse given for every other anamalous aspect of the attack on the twin towers. The twin towers themselves, were the only steel structured buildings ever to collapse from fire damage.

I'm not going to argue here, whether or not either of those two anomalies, the destruction of the black boxes or the buildings by jet fuel, were even possible. What I am going to focus on, is the absurd claim by the FBI, that a paper passport belonging to one of the 9/11 hijackers was found in the rubble.

Now let us look at the location of the black boxes in the figure below. Commercial aircraft contain 2 black boxes, one in the nose(3) of the plane and one in the tail section(3). Now what about the location of the paper passports belonging to the hijackers? They could have been in 2 places also, either in the overhead luggage area(4) or on the hijackers themselves, who could have been anywhere in the open area of the fuselage during the hijacking. Thus you would have to conclude that the only possible location of the hijackers' passports would be somewhere between the 2, virtually indestructible black boxes at the front and back of the planes.

I suppose the US government wants us to believe that 300,000 pounds of aircraft parts collided with over 13 million tons of steel(a weight estimate of 7 world trade center floors) and 14,000 cubic feet of concrete(estimate) and that a paper passport navigated it's way through all of that including an explosion that was at least 100 yards in diamter(estimate) to land safely on top of the rubble below?

Get real.

And if that were even possible, you would think the chances of it happening were once in a lifetime, right? Well how about twice?

It has since been reported, that 2 rescue workers have come forward saying that they did in fact find 3 of the 4 black boxes from flights 11 and 175, which hit the twin towers. To my knowledge, the federal government has yet to respond to these claims.

9/11 Inside Job Timeline

2005-07-20T01:17:00.000-07:00

I thought this video from C-Span would be an appropriate segway into the "9/11 Inside Job Timeline". Watch 9/11 Commission co-chairman Lee Hamilton and Washington Journal host Brian Lamb, squirm in the spotlight, taking phone calls from critical thinkers across the country who are not buying the government's official 9/11 story. Callers are cut off mid-sentence when they bring up damaging information. Brian Lamb even goes so far as to cough in order to drown out a caller. Entertaining, to say the least.

The following material is a condensed timeline of the events which occured before, during and after 9/11/01, which demonstrate in the very least, that members of the US Government knew the attacks were going to occur, removed or altered security procedures that would have prevented them, and engaged in a massive coverup afterwards. There are literally hundreds of pieces of evidence which prove this case and more, but in the interest of time, I decided to go only with a select few..

1980s

-The CIA funded and trained Osama Bin Laden to fight the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.

1996-1998

-In what was called a shocking coincidence by US Officials, 5 of the alleged 9/11 hijackers were reportedly trained at the Pensacola Naval Air Station in Florida.

September 2000

-Project for a New American Century(PNAC), a think tank organization headed up by Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and Jeb Bush, produces a document titled "Rebuilding America's Defenses", which describes the need for aggressive military spending but acknowledges that such an agenda would not likely be embraced by mainstream Americans, "absent some catalyzing, Pearl Harbor like event."(9/11 anyone?)

July 31, 2001

-Former Enron executive Tom White is appointed by the Bush administration to be Secretary of the Army, and more importantly the "executive agent for the Department of Defense".

June 1, 2001

-Tom White radically alters existing DOD protocols and issued a new directive placing all decision-making powers, specifically in the case of 'Derelict Airborne Objects', under the control of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.(This document removed the authority of well intentioned Generals and field officers to shoot down hijacked aircraft and gave the authority strictly to Donald Rumsfeld, the man who is documented as needing a "New Pearl Harbor".)

July 2001

-President Bush signs presidential directive W199I, threatening FBI agents with arrest if they investigated Osama Bin Laden's brother Abdullah, who had already been linked to the World Alliance of Muslim Youth(WAMY), a suspected terrorist organization.

-Armed Pilots are banned.

-Attorney General John Ashcroft stops flying on commercial aircraft, citing a "hijacker risk".

September 3, 2001

-Author of "The Satanic Verses" Salman Rushdie, is banned from flying on internal flights within the US and Canada.(They've gotta protect their own, right?)

September 6-7, 2001

-Record put options handled by CIA contolled companies, were purchased on United and American Airlines.

September 7, 2001

-Jeb Bush files for executive Police State Powers(order 01-261). It is still archived on Florida's own official website.

-Bomb sniffing dogs removed from world trade center.

September 8-9, 2001

-Government contractors in and out of the world trade center, allegedly working on elevator shafts(perfect place to hide demolition charges?). All electronic security, including cameras, are turned off.

September 10, 2001

-Top Pentagon officials cancel their flights.

-George Herbert Walker Bush Sr. visits the same Florida resort within hours of alleged 9/11 hijacker, Mohammed Atta.

-The Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA), arrives in New York.

September 11, 2001

-Jeb Bush invokes executive police state powers, which he filed for only 4 days previous, on September 7th.

-A CIA/NORAD war game scenario which centers around hijacked jets wrecking into the world trade center and pentagon, is being executed while real terrorist attacks are occuring in real-time.

-FDNY Chief of Safety Albert Turi reports bombs going off inside the world trade center.

-Porter Goss and Bob Grahm, the heads of the House and Senate Intelligence Committee, were eating breakfast in New York with Mahmoud Ahmad, head of the Pakistani ISI, who earlier, it was reported, wired $100,000.00 to the alleged ringleader of the 9/11 attacks, Mohammed Atta.

-Former president and CIA director George Herbert Walker Bush, was meeting with Shafig Bin Laden, Osama Bin Laden's brother, at a Carlyle Group function in the Ritz Carlton Hotel in New York, as planes were crashing into the world trade center.

-Rudy Giuliani was warned that the world trade center was about to collapse, even though no steel structured building had ever collpased from anything other than bombs. It should be noted that the world trade center engineers built the structure to withstand "multiple jumbo jet impacts".

-FAA tapes destroyed

-President's phone logs "fouled up" during communications and are therefore, unobtainable.

September 12, 2001

-Jeb Bush on a plane that removes flight school records en route to Washington.

September 17, 2001

-US officials offer Abdul Rahman Said Al-Omari an official apology for including his name among the list of suspected hijackers, as well as 2 other hijakcers whom are believed to be living in Chechnya. The official story, along with the 19 alleged hijackers still stands.

September 11-30, 2001

-Over 80% of the steel in the world trade center was either recycled or shipped to China to be smelted before it could be investigated, which is a violation of federal law.

September 20-23, 2001

-Seven of the alleged 9/11 hijackers found alive.

-Waleed Al-Shehri turns up alive in Morocco

September 11, 2002

-It is reported that one of the 9/11 hijacker's landlord was an FBI/ATF informant.

October 12, 2001

-Passenger lists of all 4 planes hijacked on 9/11 are released and no arab names, much less the names of any of the hijackers are on the lists.

September 2002

-Larry Silverstein, leaseholder of the world trade center explains in the PBS documentary "America Rebuilds", that building number 7 was a controlled demolition, even though according to the official government story, building number 7 fell from fire damage, the third of only three buildings to ever fall from fire damage, all of them on that single day.

November 12, 2004

-World Trade Center construction certifiers say that the towers should have "easily" withstood jet fuel temperatures.

Today

-At least 30 government officials have come forward since 9/11, to implicate the US Government in the attacks and a consequent coverup.

The US Government's Offical 9/11 Story is a Fraud, Take it from the Experts

2005-06-28T01:30:00.000-07:00

The Coincidence Theorist's Guide to 9/11

2005-06-12T13:23:00.000-07:00

The Coincidence Theorist's Guide to 9/11 courtesy of RigorousIntuition.com

That governments have permitted terrorist acts against their own people, and have even themselves been perpetrators in order to find strategic advantage is quite likely true, but this is the United States we're talking about.

That intelligence agencies, financiers, terrorists and narco-criminals have a long history together is well established, but the Nugan Hand Bank, BCCI, Banco Ambrosiano, the P2 Lodge, the CIA/Mafia anti-Castro/Kennedy alliance, Iran/Contra and the rest were a long time ago, so there’s no need to rehash all that. That was then, this is now!

That Jonathan Bush’s Riggs Bank has been found guilty of laundering terrorist funds and fined a US-record $25 million must embarrass his nephew George, but it's still no justification for leaping to paranoid conclusions.

That George Bush's brother Marvin sat on the board of the Kuwaiti-owned company which provided electronic security to the World Trade Centre, Dulles Airport and United Airlines means nothing more than you must admit those Bush boys have done alright for themselves.

That George Bush found success as a businessman only after the investment of Osama’s brother Salem and reputed al Qaeda financier Khalid bin Mahfouz is just one of those things - one of those crazy things.

That Osama bin Laden is known to have been an asset of US foreign policy in no way implies he still is.

That al Qaeda was active in the Balkan conflict, fighting on the same side as the US as recently as 1999, while the US protected its cells, is merely one of history's little aberrations.

The claims of Michael Springman, State Department veteran of the Jeddah visa bureau, that the CIA ran the office and issued visas to al Qaeda members so they could receive training in the United States, sound like the sour grapes of someone who was fired for making such wild accusations.

That one of George Bush's first acts as President, in January 2001, was to end the two-year deployment of attack submarines which were positioned within striking distance of al Qaeda's Afghanistan camps, even as the group's guilt for the Cole bombing was established, proves that a transition from one administration to the next is never an easy task.

That so many influential figures in and close to the Bush White House had expressed, just a year before the attacks, the need for a "new Pearl Harbor" before their militarist ambitions could be fulfilled, demonstrates nothing more than the accidental virtue of being in the right place at the right time.

That the company PTECH, founded by a Saudi financier placed on America’s Terrorist Watch List in October 2001, had access to the FAA’s entire computer system for two years before the 9/11 attack, means he must not have been such a threat after all.

That whistleblower Indira Singh was told to keep her mouth shut and forget what she learned when she took her concerns about PTECH to her employers and federal authorities, suggests she lacked the big picture. And that the Chief Auditor for JP Morgan Chase told Singh repeatedly, as she answered questions about who supplied her with what information, that "that person should be killed," suggests he should take an anger management seminar.

That on May 8, 2001, Dick Cheney took upon himself the job of co-ordinating a response to domestic terror attacks even as he was crafting the administration’s energy policy which bore implications for America's military, circumventing the established infrastructure and ignoring the recommendations of the Hart-Rudman report, merely shows the VP to be someone who finds it hard to delegate.

That the standing order which covered the shooting down of hijacked aircraft was altered on June 1, 2001, taking discretion away from field commanders and placing it solely in the hands of the Secretary of Defense, is simply poor planning and unfortunate timing. Fortunately the error has been corrected, as the order was rescinded shortly after 9/11.

That in the weeks before 9/11, FBI agent Colleen Rowley found her investigation of Zacarias Moussaoui so perversely thwarted that her colleagues joked that bin Laden had a mole at the FBI, proves the stress-relieving virtue of humour in the workplace.

That Dave Frasca of the FBI’s Radical Fundamentalist Unit received a promotion after quashing multiple, urgent requests for investigations into al Qaeda assets training at flight schools in the summer of 2001 does appear on the surface odd, but undoubtedly there's a good reason for it, quite possibly classified.

That FBI informant Randy Glass, working an undercover sting, was told by Pakistani intelligence operatives that the World Trade Center towers were coming down, and that his repeated warnings which continued until weeks before the attacks, including the mention of planes used as weapons, were ignored by federal authorities, is simply one of the many "What Ifs" of that tragic day.

That over the summer of 2001 Washington received many urgent, senior-level warnings from foreign intelligence agencies and governments - including those of Germany, France, Great Britain, Russia, Egypt, Israel, Morocco, Afghanistan and others - of impending terror attacks using hijacked aircraft and did nothing, demonstrates the pressing need for a new Intelligence Czar.

That John Ashcroft stopped flying commercial aircraft in July 2001 on account of security considerations had nothing to do with warnings regarding September 11, because he said so to the 9/11 Commission.

That former lead counsel for the House David Schippers says he’d taken to John Ashcroft’s office specific warnings he’d learned from FBI agents in New York of an impending attack – even naming the proposed dates, names of the hijackers and the targets – and that the investigations had been stymied and the agents threatened, proves nothing but David Schipper’s pathetic need for attention.

That Garth Nicolson received two warnings from contacts in the intelligence community and one from a North African head of state, which included specific site, date and source of the attacks, and passed the information to the Defense Department and the National Security Council to evidently no effect, clearly amounts to nothing, since virtually nobody has ever heard of him.

That in the months prior to September 11, self-described US intelligence operative Delmart Vreeland sought, from a Toronto jail cell, to get US and Canadian authorities to heed his warning of his accidental discovery of impending catastrophic attacks is worthless, since Vreeland was a dubious character, notwithstanding the fact that many of his claims have since been proven true.

That FBI Special Investigator Robert Wright claims that agents assigned to intelligence operations actually protect terrorists from investigation and prosecution, that the FBI shut down his probe into terrorist training camps, and that he was removed from a money-laundering case that had a direct link to terrorism, sounds like yet more sour grapes from a disgruntled employee.

That George Bush had plans to invade Afghanistan on his desk before 9/11 demonstrates only the value of being prepared.

The suggestion that securing a pipeline across Afghanistan figured into the White House’s calculations is as ludicrous as the assertion that oil played a part in determining war in Iraq.

That Afghanistan is once again the world’s principal heroin producer is an unfortunate reality, but to claim the CIA is still actively involved in the narcotics trade is to presume bad faith on the part of the agency.

Mahmood Ahmed, chief of Pakistan’s ISI, must not have authorized an al Qaeda payment of $100,000 to Mohammed Atta days before the attacks, and was not meeting with senior Washington officials over the week of 9/11, because I didn’t read anything about him in the official report.

That Porter Goss met with Ahmed the morning of September 11 in his capacity as Chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has no bearing whatsoever upon his recent selection by the White House to head the Central Intelligence Agency.

That Goss's congressional seat encompasses the 9/11 hijackers' Florida base of operation, including their flight schools, is precisely the kind of meaningless factoid a conspiracy theorist would bring up.

It's true that George HW Bush and Dick Cheney spent the evening of September 10 alone in the Oval Office, but what's wrong with old colleagues catching up? And it's true that George HW Bush and Shafig bin Laden, Osama's brother, spent the morning of September 11 together at a board meeting of the Carlyle Group, but the bin Ladens are a big family.

That FEMA arrived in New York on Sept 10 to prepare for a scheduled biowarfare drill, and had a triage centre ready to go that was larger and better equipped than the one that was lost in the collapse of WTC 7, was a lucky twist of fate.

Newsweek’s report that senior Pentagon officials cancelled flights on Sept 10 for the following day on account of security concerns is only newsworthy because of what happened the following morning.

That George Bush's telephone logs for September 11 do not exist should surprise no one, given the confusion of the day.

That Mohamed Atta attended the International Officer's School at Maxwell Air Force Base, that Abdulaziz Alomari attended Brooks Air Force Base Aerospace Medical School, that Saeed Alghamdi attended the Defense Language Institute in Monterey merely shows it is a small world, after all.

That Lt Col Steve Butler, Vice Chancellor for student affairs of the Defense Language Institute during Alghamdi's terms, was disciplined, removed from his post and threatened with court martial when he wrote "Bush knew of the impending attacks on America. He did nothing to warn the American people because he needed this war on terrorism. What is...contemptible is the President of the United States not telling the American people what he knows for political gain," is the least that should have happened for such disrespect shown his Commander in Chief.

That Mohammed Atta dressed like a Mafioso, had a stripper girlfriend, smuggled drugs, was already a licensed pilot when he entered the US, enjoyed pork chops, drank to excess and did cocaine, was closer to Europeans than Arabs in Florida, and included the names of defence contractors on his email list, proves how dangerous the radical fundamentalist Muslim can be.

That 43 lbs of heroin was found on board the Lear Jet owned by Wally Hilliard, the owner of Atta’s flight school, just three weeks after Atta enrolled – the biggest seizure ever in Central Florida – was just bad luck. That Hilliard was not charged shows how specious the claims for conspiracy truly are.

That Hilliard’s plane had made 30-round trips to Venezuela with the same passengers who always paid cash, that the plane had been supplied by a pair of drug smugglers who had also outfitted CIA drug runner Barry Seal, and that 9/11 commissioner Richard ben-Veniste had been Seal’s attorney before Seal’s murder, shows nothing but the lengths to which conspiracists will go to draw sinister conclusions.

Reports of insider trading on 9/11 are false, because the SEC investigated and found only respectable investors who will remain nameless involved, and no terrorists, so the windfall profit-taking was merely, as ever, coincidental.

That heightened security for the World Trade Centre was lifted immediately prior to the attacks illustrates that it always happens when you least expect it.

That Hani Hanjour, the pilot of Flight 77, was so incompetent he could not fly a Cessna in August, but in September managed to fly a 767 at excessive speed into a spiraling, 270-degree descent and a level impact of the first floor of the Pentagon, on the only side that was virtually empty and had been hardened to withstand a terrorist attack, merely demonstrates that people can do almost anything once they set their minds to it.

That none of the flight data recorders were said to be recoverable even though they were located in the tail sections, and that until 9/11, no solid-state recorder in a catastrophic crash had been unrecoverable, shows how there's a first time for everything.

That Mohammed Atta left a uniform, a will, a Koran, his driver's license and a "how to fly planes" video in his rental car at the airport means he had other things on his mind.

The mention of Israelis with links to military-intelligence having been arrested on Sept 11 videotaping and celebrating the attacks, of an Israeli espionage ring surveiling DEA and defense installations and trailing the hijackers, and of a warning of impending attacks delivered to the Israeli company Odigo two hours before the first plane hit, does not deserve a response. That the stories also appeared in publications such as Ha'aretz and Forward is a sad display of self-hatred among certain elements of the Israeli media.

That multiple military wargames and simulations were underway the morning of 9/11 – one simulating the crash of a plane into a building; another, a live-fly simulation of multiple hijackings – and took many interceptors away from the eastern seaboard and confused field commanders as to which was a real hijacked aircraft and which was a hoax, was a bizarre coincidence, but no less a coincidence.

That the National Military Command Center ops director asked a rookie substitute to stand his watch at 8:30 am on Sept. 11 is nothing more than bad timing.

That a recording made Sept 11 of air traffic controllers’ describing what they had witnessed, was destroyed by an FAA official who crushed it in his hand, cut the tape into little pieces and dropped them in different trash cans around the building, is something no doubt that overzealous official wishes he could undo.

That the FBI knew precisely which Florida flight schools to descend upon hours after the attacks should make every American feel safer knowing their federal agents are on the ball.

That a former flight school executive believes the hijackers were "double agents," and says about Atta and associates, "Early on I gleaned that these guys had government protection. They were let into this country for a specific purpose," and was visited by the FBI just four hours after the attacks to intimidate him into silence, proves he's an unreliable witness, for the simple reason there is no conspiracy.

That Jeb Bush was on board an aircraft that removed flight school records to Washington in the middle of the night on Sept 12th demonstrates how seriously the governor takes the issue of national security.

To insinuate evil motive from the mercy flights of bin Laden family members and Saudi royals after 9/11 shows the sickness of the conspiratorial mindset.

Le Figaro’s report in October 2001, known to have originated with French intelligence, that the CIA met Osama bin Laden in a Dubai hospital in July 2001, proves again the perfidy of the French.

That the tape in which bin Laden claims responsibility for the attacks was released by the State Department after having been found providentially by US forces in Afghanistan, and depicts a fattened Osama with a broader face and a flatter nose, proves Osama, and Osama alone, masterminded 9/11.

That at the battle of Tora Bora, where bin Laden was surrounded on three sides, Special Forces received no order to advance and capture him and were forced to stand and watch as two Russian-made helicopters flew into the area where bin Laden was believed hiding, loaded up passengers and returned to Pakistan, demonstrates how confusing the modern battlefield can be.

That upon returning to Fort Bragg from Tora Bora, the same Special Operations troops who had been stood down from capturing bin Laden, suffered a unusual spree of murder/suicides, is nothing more than a series of senseless tragedies.

Reports that bin Laden is currently receiving periodic dialysis treatment in a Pakistani medical hospital are simply too incredible to be true.

That the White House went on Cipro September 11 shows the foresightedness of America’s emergency response.

That the anthrax was mailed to perceived liberal media and the Democratic leadership demonstrates only the perversity of the terrorist psyche.

That the anthrax attacks appeared to silence opponents of the Patriot Act shows only that appearances can be deceiving.

That the Ames-strain anthrax was found to have originated at Fort Detrick, and was beyond the capability of all but a few labs to refine, underscores the importance of allowing the investigation to continue without the distraction of absurd conspiracy theories.

That Republican guru Grover Norquist has been found to have aided financiers and supporters of Islamic terror to gain access to the Bush White House, and is a founder of the Islamic Institute, which the Treasury Department believes to be a source of funding for al Qaeda, suggests Norquist is at worst, naive, and at best, needs a wider circle of friends.

That the Department of Justice consistently chooses to see accused 9/11 plotters go free rather than permit the courtroom testimony of al Qaeda leaders in American custody looks bad, but only because we don't have all the facts.

That the White House balked at any inquiry into the events of 9/11, then starved it of funds and stonewalled it, was unfortunate, but since the commission didn't find for conspiracy it's all a non issue anyway.

That the 9/11 commission's executive director and "gatekeeper," Philip Zelikow, was so closely involved in the events under investigation that he testified before the the commission as part of the inquiry, shows only an apparent conflict of interest.

That commission chair Thomas Kean is, like George Bush, a Texas oil executive who had business dealings with reputed al Qaeda financier Khalid bin Mafouz, suggests Texas is smaller than they say it is.

That co-chair Lee Hamilton has a history as a Bush family "fixer," including clearing Bush Sr of the claims arising from the 1980 "October Surprise", is of no concern, since only conspiracists believe there was such a thing as an October Surprise.

That FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds accuses the agency of intentionally fudging specific pre-9/11 warnings and harboring a foreign espionage ring in its translation department, and claims she witnessed evidence of the semi-official infrastructure of money-laundering and narcotics trade behind the attacks, is of no account, since John Ashcroft has gagged her with the rare invocation of "State Secrets Privilege," and retroactively classified her public testimony. For the sake of national security, let us speak no more of her.

That, when commenting on Edmond's case, Daniel Ellsberg remarked that Ashcroft could go to prison for his part in a cover-up, suggests Ellsberg is giving comfort to the terrorists, and could, if he doesn't wise up, find himself declared an enemy combatant.

I could go on. And on and on. But I trust you get the point. Which is simply this: there are no secrets, an American government would never accept civilian casualties for geostrategic gain, and conspiracies are for the weak-minded and gullible.

The spinning of the smoking guns: More pre-9/11 US intelligence connections to al-Qaeda exposed and spun

2005-05-31T22:54:00.000-07:00

Check your partisan beliefs at the door. This article holds Bush, Clinton and Washington bureaucrats accountable for 9/11. Read it in it's entirety.

The spinning of the smoking guns
More pre-9/11 US intelligence connections to al-Qaeda exposed and spun

By Larry Chin | August 24 2005

In recent weeks, two "revelations" of pre-9/11 US military-intelligence relationships with al-Qaeda "terrorists" and Osama bin Laden are being used as cannon fodder in an intensifying power struggle between rival political factions vying to seize the "war on terrorism" agenda for their own, and deepen the cover-up of 9/11.
The furor over new stories involving alleged 9/11 hijacker Mohammed Atta and US-bin Laden go-between Tarik Hamdi pits spinmasters against other spinmasters—Kean 9/11 Commission supporters versus hawkish Bush-linked 9/11 Commission attackers, neocons versus neoliberals, and intelligence and law enforcement agencies are at each other's throats again over "intelligence failures."

While the spin has dwelled exclusively around "anti-terrorism" and various red herrings, and the supposed frustration over the tracking and arrest of al-Qaeda members, the true evidence trail continues to be purposely ignored. This trail leads directly to high-level US government officials and US intelligence agencies themselves (and US intelligence branches such as Pakistan's ISI), for their nurturing, guiding and placement of "Islamic terrorist" intelligence assets (including Atta, Hamdi, bin Laden and al-Qaeda), and US complicity in 9/11.

Osama's US Contact

Newly unsealed court papers charge that Tarik A. Hamdi, an Iraqi-born American citizen and a former resident of Herndon, Virginia (a suburb of Washington, DC, and a hotbed of intelligence-connected groups), and a direct and key American contact for Osama bin Laden, is now a member of the Iraqi Foreign Ministry in Ankara, Turkey.

According to the affadavit from Customs Agent David Kane, and facts confirmed by US authorities (including the FBI), Hamdi supplied a satellite telephone battery to bin Laden, who was in Afghanistan in 1998.

Hamdi, former CIA counter-terrorism chief Vince Cannistraro, and Pakistani journalist (and ISI "favorite") Rahimullah Yusufszai were among the few go-betweens with bin Laden who set up interviews with bin Laden for American journalists, such as John Miller (now a Commanding Officer in the Los Angeles Police Department's Counter-Terrorism Bureau). During this period, Cannistraro, Miller and Yusufszai worked for ABC News. Hamdi also had a working relationship with recently deceased ABC anchorman Peter Jennings, who tapped Hamdi as a Middle East expert more than once.

As noted by Chaim Kupferberg, "Cannistraro, a former CIA counterterrorism chief, provided covert aid to the Afghani mujahadeen in the late 80s, as well as supervised CIA operations with the contras. He was also a point man in the notoriously circumspect investigation at Lockerbie."

Hamdi has also been indicted on fraud and immigration charges. Federal agents have also held Hamdi under scrutiny since 2002 for his involvement with the International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT) think tank in northern Virginia, and ties to other alleged members of al-Qaeda. The IIIT itself has been suspected of ties to Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. Interestingly, the IIIT is one of many Saudi/Islamic fronts under investigation (see "Role of Charities and NGOs In the Financing of Terrorist Activities"), but also deeply connected to the Republican Party apparatus and Bush/Rove, via Grover Norquist.

The relationship Hamdi enjoyed with ABC, Miller, and Cannistraro leads to deeper issues that go to the heart of the 9/11 operation, as detailed by Kupferberg in "The Propaganda Preparation for 9/11".

Kupferberg points out that " . . . if the bin Laden threat was, pre-9/11, a close-knit propaganda campaign, one would expect to find the same names showing up repeatedly in combination with one another." Among the short list of "same names" who managed the flow of available information on bin Laden, we find Miller and Cannistraro.

Specifically regarding ABC and bin Laden, Kupferberg said:

" . . . it is my contention that al-Qaida and bin Laden are elaborate 'legends' set up to promote a plausibly sophisticated and ferocious enemy to stand against American interests. I am not, however, implying that bin Laden himself is a total fabrication. Rather, it is my contention that confederates, believing themselves to act on behalf of bin Laden, are being set up in a 'false flag operation' to perform operations as their controllers see fit.

"If [9/11] were an 'inside job,' the first thing to do was to look at who conveyed specific information on bin Laden before—and I stress, before—9/11, for they were most likely involved wittingly or not with those who masterminded it.

"Yusufszai . . . moonlighted as an ABC News producer, charged with guiding ABC News correspondent John Miller through the Afghani marshes to bin Laden's cave—one of the very few American journalists to be accorded such an honour (and also, as it happens, a good friend of bin Laden arch-foe John O'Neill . . . )

"Yusufszai's ABC colleague, John Miller, mused about running into his buddy John O'Neill in Yemen while reporting on the U.S.S. Cole bombing the year before.

"Miller, one of the very few Americans who can give a first-hand account of bin Laden, bumps into his friend, bin Laden's chief investigator, while both are investigating a bombing in Yemen that will later be tagged onto bin Laden—and only a year before O'Neill dies at the hands of . . . allegedly . . . bin Laden.

" . . . Vincent Cannistraro, the ABC News analyst who also escorted John Miller to his bin Laden interview, as well as provided running commentary in the days immediately following 9/11. Cannistraro, a former CIA counterterrorism chief, provided covert aid to the Afghani mujahadeen in the late 80s, as well as supervised CIA operations with the contras. He was also a point man in the notoriously circumspect investigation at Lockerbie. In the above noted [Washington Post reporter Vernon] Loeb and [Washington Post's Walter] Pincus article—in which bin Laden is quoted from the ABC News Miller and Yusufszai interview—Cannistraro weighs in with his assessment of the embassy bombings: 'I believe Osama bin Laden is the sponsor of this operation, and I think all of the indications are pointing that way.'"

As the man who "had contacts with the contacts" and helped Cannistraro lead Miller to bin Laden, Hamdi is at the center of the network that created the al-Qaeda "terror" legend. And that may be the tip of the iceberg. Over the past decade, Hamdi has served Anglo-American intelligence interests. He has gone from being a key bin Laden go-between, to becoming an official in the new Iraqi government, right under the nose of the authorities of several nations, including the CIA, the FBI, US law enforcement, the State Department, and the US occupation in Baghdad.

At the time of this writing, no information is available to explain how Hamdi secured his Iraqi government post. Cannistraro remains in contact with Hamdi, and believes that Hamdi is being unfairly harassed by federal authorities who, he believes, have failed to make their case.

Able Danger/Mohammed Atta: How Many Ways Can You Spell and Spin, "Foreknowledge?"

Over the past month, Washington political circles and major media organs (Washington Post, the New York Times, etc.) have been galvanized over what appears to be a new claim that yet another US intelligence unit "knew."

Army intelligence officer Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, and Congressman Curt Weldon (R-Pa), have gone public with the charge that a Special Operations Command data mining program run by a secret US intelligence unit, code named Able Danger, had identified alleged 9/11 lead hijacker Mohammed Atta and three other al-Qaeda operatives operating in the United States, as early as 1999.

The Able Danger team, with whom Shaffer worked as a liason, claims it sought but failed to persuade the Defense Department and the Tampa, Florida-based Special Operations Command to share this information, that the unit believes could have stopped 9/11, with the FBI. They further charge that this information was rejected by the 9/11 Commission, even after repeated overtures from both Weldon and Shaffer, which included meetings with commission members and document exchanges.

The 9/11 Commission has defended itself, claiming that the charges of Shaffer and Weldon are unreliable. In a statement, Commission Chairman Thomas Kean and Vice Chairman Lee Hamilton stated that the Able Danger program was not "historically significant, set against the larger context of US policy and intelligence efforts." Shaffer considers this charge absurd: Able Danger was created specifically to target al-Qaeda.

As this controversy continues to unfold, it would seem that Shaffer/Able Danger thoroughly vindicates what legions of critics of the official version of 9/11 have been documenting and exposing for the past four years. In "9/11 Commission told of Atta cover-up", Patrick Martin of the World Socialist Website wrote that the Shaffer statements "shatter the official story of the September 11 attacks, as devised by the Bush administration, endorsed by the entire Washington political establishment, and parroted obediently by the media.

"It is now clear that those who have rejected [the official account of 9/11] have been proven right," writes Martin. "The future hijackers were detected by US government agencies, including the CIA and military intelligence, yet nothing was done either to arrest them or disrupt their activities . . . There is only one politically serious explanation of this now-indisputable fact: powerful forces within the US military/intelligence complex wanted a terrorist incident on US soil in order to create the needed shift in public opinion required to embark on a long-planned campaign of military intervention in Central Asia and the Middle East."

From a deeper perspective, however, the new Atta/Able Danger information is not a "revelation." In fact, it is old news, and an original 9/11 red herring, warmed over. In short, it shows that a US intelligence unit "knew, and were prevented from acting on what they knew" and perhaps "stopping 9/11." While the newly disclosed source—Able Danger and the DIA—is relevant and interesting for many reasons, as is the timing and political game unfolding, nothing has been added to the actual Atta evidence. More importantly, the al-Qaeda's network's connection to US military-intelligence, the evidence that 9/11 was a false flag operation, is not addressed at all. Atta and company are assumed foreign terrorists responsible for attacking America, fully consistent with the core of the official and original 9/11 lie.

Able Danger/Atta adds little to what independent researchers and analysts Center for Research on Globalization/Global Outlook, From The Wilderness, Online Journal, and Center for Cooperative Research to name just a handful) already know:

-We know that the "Islamic terrorism" is a creation and tool of Anglo-American geostrategy, created by the US government in the 1970s, fully utilized during the Clinton administration, and nurtured from the Reagan-Bush administrations to the present Bush administrations.

-We know who Osama bin Laden is (or was). In Crossing The Rubicon, Mike Ruppert noted:

"The Washington Post explicitly suggested that the real relationship between the United States government [USG] and Osama bin Laden may be quite the opposite of what it seems. 'As early as March 1996, the government of Sudan offered to extradite bin Laden to the United States. US officials turned down the offer, perhaps preferring to use him 'as a combatant in an underground war.'" In other words, as a US government agent. In a footnote, Ruppert analyzes the above passage, and cuts to the core of 9/11, and the deception that the world has faced for the past four years:

"If this means that OBL is to be 'used as a combatant' on the USG side, it strongly suggests that he is a willing participant in such an effort and that his CIA affiliation from the Mujahadeen war of the 1980s has persisted. If the same locution means that OBL is to be 'used' as a combatant on the anti-USG terrorist side of the supposed war on terror, it strongly suggests that the USG is engaged in the business of supplying itself with enemies. That practice is called 'false flag' operation, and 9/11 is the greatest exemplar in history."

-We know that al-Qaeda is connected to the ISI, which, in turn is a virtual branch of the CIA, and involved in US covert operations.

-We know that numerous intelligence agencies had monitored, penetrated, and guided al-Qaeda assets. Notwithstanding the denials of Washington's law enforcement and intelligence agencies, al-Qaeda and its operatives were under scrutiny years before 9/11, and completely penetrated.

-According to Ruppert, who exhaustively broke down this penetration over several chapters of his book, Crossing the Rubicon, "based on what is known about successful intelligence penetrations for years prior to the attacks of 9/11, Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda could not have sneezed without the CIA or the NSA knowing about it."

-We know that it is standard intelligence procedure to create intelligence legends and multiple layers of plausible deniability around their operatives.

-We know who, and what, Atta was. Investigative journalist Daniel Hopsicker exposed the backgrounds and movements of the Atta cell and the "hijackers" prior to 9/11. Members of the Atta cell received military training, and had connections to intelligence and intelligence-connected Floridians with direct Bush family ties.

-We know that various US intelligence and law enforcement agencies, agents, and officers had information—and were systematically blocked from reporting the information and acting on it by gatekeepers of the 9/11 false flag operation.

-We know that Atta received funding from the ISI for 9/11, and that then-ISI Chief Mahmoud Ahmad wired $100,000 directly to Atta, and met with Washington lawmakers on the morning of 9/11 (including the current director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Porter Goss).

-We know that there were and are 9/11 gatekeepers in the government, the FBI, the CIA, and all over the world.

-We know that 9/11 was not an "intelligence failure," but an "intelligence success" that included the use of guided al-Qaeda assets, and "hijacker" intelligence legends.

-We know that the Kean 9/11 Commission has been a massive cover-up, from its inception to the very end.

What is somewhat "revelatory" is how US intelligence and law enforcement agents, and politicians, seem to be stumbling over themselves to blow the whistle now, four years after the fact, and they are being (selectively) permitted to do so. As Martin points out: "That a serving intelligence of Shaffer's rank should come forward publicly is a sign of intense and deepening crisis within the US intelligence apparatus . . . Within military/intelligence circles, the knives are out."

Similarly, we see the new parameters of media treatment of the "war on terrorism" and Bush. Damning evidence that would have been blocked from public dissemination immediately following 9/11 (through various forms of censorship and intimidation) is now permissible mainstream news fodder.

What this suggests is that the Bush regime has lost its grip over the "management" of the 9/11 legend. Indeed, this administration is losing the war it created, in all of the most important ways.

Worse, as Martin writes, "the 9/11 Commission report is now discredited as a bipartisan cover-up, in which Democrats and Republicans joined forces to protect the key institutions of the state." This is forcing competing elite factions of various agendas into a new struggle put the "war on terrorism" and the 9/11 story "back on track," lest Anglo-American geostrategy lose its central pretext.

Right-Wing Distortion

Patrick Martin astutely points out, "The representatives of the extreme right—Fox, the Murdoch press, Rush Limbaugh and other right-wing talk radio hosts, and an array of bloggers—have made more noise about Able Danger, but only on the service of a political diversion. They have sought to use Shaffer's account to indict the Clinton administration and shift responsibility for the 9/11 security failure from Bush to his Democratic predecessor." While Republicans involved with the Kean Commission, such as Phil Zelikow, have gotten a free pass from the right wing, Democrats have been smeared, from Jamie Gorelick, to former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger, who was accused of stealing 9/11-related documents (he was later cleared over this still-questionable activity).

Congressman Curt Weldon, who has been spearheading the Able Danger case in Washington, is pushing a right-wing agenda. Weldon, the number one critic of the 9/11 Commission, has a reputation as a loose cannon. His book Countdown to Terror not only pushes for more aggressive anti-terrorism, but also goes after Iran (Iran-as-terrorist, Iran-targeting-nuclear-facilities, etc.). Weldon has been criticized by Dana Priest of the Washington Post, and the New York Times. The bottom line: Weldon's bias and goals must be questioned.

A more disgusting example can be seen in Iran-Contra thug-turned-media pundit Oliver North's leap on to the Able Danger bandwagon. North, one of the most shameless political criminals in modern history, is predictably carrying water for his old narco-trafficking war criminal-infested Iran-Contra network, and still playing and profiting from post 9/11 war and covert operations. Lest anyone forget who North is:

CIA IG Report, Volume II

Contra-Intelligence on Oliver North (by Federal Drug Agent Celerino Castillo)

Iran-Contra connections to 9/11

Bush-Bin Laden connections

Oliver North in Fallujah

"Torture Inc.:Oliver North Joins the Party"

Thorough Indictment of US Government in 9/11 Attacks

2005-05-30T17:12:00.000-07:00

Let me first say that I consider myself a conservative libertarian. I did not vote for Bush or Kerry. I will never vote for the "lesser of 2 evils." I don't support socialized healthcare, nor do I support social security for reasons too lengthy to get into.

I'd like to say I support capital punishment but the fact is, it costs more tax payer money on average to execute someone through the judicial system than it does to feed, clothe and shelter them for the rest of their lives. Strange but true.

These issues are all important but the immediate, all encompassing issue I want to talk about is 9/11 and the war on terror.

I would like to open this dialouge with a quote from the film Matrix but what notions I suggest you entertain in the following paragraphs are anything but fantasy. I take this deadly serious, as should every American.

“You take the blue pill and the story ends. You wake in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes” -Morpheus

Another interesting quote is from Adolph Hitler himself.

What I propose, is that a small faction of powerful men in the US government knew of the terrorist events of 9/11 in advance and deliberately dismantled security procedures that would have prevented them so that they could use the fear and anger later to be associated with the events, as political license to do whatever they wanted in the world, domestically and internationally.

If such a notion makes your blood boil, I suggest you take a deep breath before you read what I am about to present to you.

First of all, you have to understand that such acts are nothing new. They even have a word for it:

Hegelian Dialectic, or Problem-Reaction-Solution

Nazi archives now conclusively show, Hitler had his own troops burn down Germany's Reichstag Parliament building on 1/30, 1933. He then blamed this terrorist act on Poland and began grandstanding in the charred wreckage of the building.

In the wake of this event, he formed the the "Enabling Act", which gave the state, “for the protection of the German people”, the power to restrict demonstrations, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and the sanctity of the home, security of mail and telephone, and authorized the confiscation of literature considered to be dangerous to the state. It gave police the authority to invade homes without warrants and wire tap phones indiscriminately.

I suggest you read the "Enabling Act" and then read the "Patriot Act" and tell me where you think they got the inspiration for the "Patriot Act". For me to even scratch the surface of the plethora of unanswered questions rearding September 11th, I could spend days citing government documents, the testimony of goverment officials themselves, mainstream media coverage, and the offical record, then point out where all of these sources have contradicted themselves and tried to rationalize their absurdity in doing so.

Here are but a few things about 9/11 that I for one, find deeply disturbing.

-In the weeks and months before 9/11, the North American Aeorspace Defense Command(NORAD) was running drills to prepare for hijacked airliners being flown into buildings. One of these drills was underway on the morning of 9/11 just as that very same scenario was taking place in real time. Coincidence? I think not.

So if they did know about the attacks in advance, why would they schedule the drills to take place at the same time as the real attacks?

Answer: As a smokescreen.

If the people at NORAD mistook the real thing for a drill, they wouldn't scramble fighter jets and the errant planes would be allowed to hit their targets just as they did. It's interesting to note that 9/11 was the first time in NORAD's 50 year history that it took the military longer than 20 minutes to scramble fighter jets. According to federal regulations, fighter aircraft must engage all errant planes within 20 minutes of their violation of unauthorized airspace. On 9/11, some of these planes were off course for over an hour and a half and thus were allowed to hit their tartgets. You don't believe this is true? It was right here in USA Today.

-This photo, which was archived on the Pentagon's own website in the year 2000, clearly shows a scaled down model of the pentagon w/ crashed jet wreckage burning in it's courtyard, emergency vehicles all around, yet Bush's cabinet stated over and over, that they had never envisioned a terrorist plan to fly hijacked jets into buildings.

-How is it that when famous golfer Payne Stewart flying on his private plane in 1995, deviated from his flight plan and was engaged by four F-16s in less than 10 minutes yet on September 11th, 4 planes turned off their transponders within a span of 5 minutes of each other and none were engaged by fighter aircraft. It is standard procedure that they be engaged in less than 20minutes. That procedure had been executed according to the official procedure over 100 times in NORAD's 46 year history, yet failed miserably 4 times on 9/11.

-How is it that Building number 7 fell at approximately 5:30pm that evening when it was not hit by a plane nor did it sustain collateral damage from the falling towers(each tower fell within a 70ft radius)? Building7 was a 49 story FEMA(Federal Emergency Management Agency) command bunker "overengineered to withstand complete infrastructure breakdown". It had it's own air supply, was fireproof, and contained the offices of customs, secret service, CIA, the Department of Defense and the Securities and Exchange Commission.

-The sharton hotel, a much smaller building positioned right up against WTC tower 2 was buried in tower 2's rubble and had fires raging on many of it's floors, yet it never fell.

-To this day, FEMA states that building number 7 fell from fire damage, which was the 3rd and only time in world history(all on that day) that steel structured buildings have fallen from fire damage. Not even in 1949, when a B-2 bomber wrecked into the 79th floor of the Empire State Building, causing fires to rage through several floors, did the building come down.

-This is contrary to what Larry Silverstein said on the PBS documentary "Rebuilding America", in which he stated, "There was such a great loss of life that day, so we decided to just go ahead and "pull it" and "We got the word to pull it, and then stood back and watched the building(World Trade Center 7) come down.

-The head engineer of the World Trade Center, Minoru Yamasaki, even said that they designed the towers to withstand multiple jumbo jet impacts.

-What about the seismograph readings from surrounding universities which recorded multiple explosions?

-Larry Silverstein, lease holder of World Trade Center building7, bought the entire complex just a few months before the attacks and took out a 3 billion dollar insurance policy, which he is soon to receive in full.

-How could a demoltion team defy all logic in the midst of such pandemonium and coordinate a demoltion, planting hundreds of charges to bring the building down only a matter of hours after the attacks? Did the demolition team get hit up on their pagers and decide to come to work only hours after the attacks and in the midst of such confusion(People didn't even know the status of the surrounding structures, whether there was bombs in the buildings or more attacks coming).

-It's ludicrous to believe that bombs were in the building right? I mean, how would they be able to sneak in explosive devices with the level of security on that building? Well guess who was running security on the world trade center? Marvin Bush, our current president's youngest brother.

-Just days before 9/11, bomb sniffing dogs were removed from the world trade center, electronic security, including cameras were shut down, and government contractors were in and out of the building, allegedly working on the elevator shafts(perfect place to hide explosive charges?).

-What is to be said of all of the live footage on September 11th, when anchors described secondary explosions going off as you heard the crowd react in gasps of shock? or senior fighterfighter Lou Cacchioli's testimony that a bomb went off on their 2nd trip up? Are we to disregard our own eyes and ears and the testimony of witnessess who were there yet buy the official government story, which tries to rationalize the absurd events that occured that day?

-On June 1st, 2001, The Pentagon's shootdown protocol for hijacked aircraft was radically altered, removing the authority from generals and field officers and giving it exclusively to Donald Rumsfeld.

-Why did Jeb Bush request executive police state powers on September 7th and conveiniently invoke them 4 days later on September 11th? It was archived on Florida State's own website.

-Mahoud Ahmed, head of Pakistani's ISI inteligence agency was meeting w/ George Tenet, and the heads of the house and Senate inteligence community, Porter Goss(R) and Bob Grahm(D) on the morning of 9/11. It later came out that he had previously wired $100,000.00 to Mohammed Atta, the alleged ringleader of the 9/11 attacks. What was the terror attack money man doing eating breakfast w/ US inteligence in New York as planes slammed into buildings?

What was George Bush Sr. doing w/ Shafig Bin Laden on the morning of 9/11?

-Why do none of the publicly released passenger lists from any of the 4 hijacked planes on 9/11 have the alleged hijackers names on them, much less any arab names at all?

-There's been several stories in the press in the past couple years about how technology will soon be available that will allow you to execute cell phone calls during commerical aircraft flights. Well what about all of the alleged phone calls made to 911 dispatchers and family members from passengers of the hijacked jets on 9/11? A study was done in 2003, which proves that such calls would have been virtually impossible.

-It's been widely reported(everywhere but the US), that at least 9 of the alleged 9/11 hijackers are alive and well, not because they survived the impacts, but because they were never on the planes! Here is just one of those reports.

-What about David Schippers, the man who prosecuted Clinton in his impeachment proceedings? He has filed suit against John Ashcroft and the Dept. of Justice, saying he represents agents who were taken off cases that were yielding important leads. Schippers says that he had knowledge of the attacks months in advance and desparately tried to get a hold of Ashcroft or anyone who would listen in the Justice Dept but they would not return his calls.

-Stanley Hilton, another conservative, was formerly chiefs of staff under Bob Dole. He's filed a suit against Bush on behalf of the 9/11 victim's families, saying he has evidence that Bush was directly involved in 9/11. How come the mainstream media has not reported on these pending cases? Haven't we heard enough about Michael Jackson and Robert Blake?

-Here is an entire archive of links to hundreds of different news sources, which document the anamalous, still unexplained events of 9/11. I hope that you will examine the information herein.

There are at least 3 public documents that should dispell any notion that people in our government do not have the power or motive to orchestrate such an attack or to stand down as it unfolds.

The 1st document was written and signed by Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld, William Kristol, and Jeb Bush, all of which are in the Bush administration except for George's little brother Jeb.

"Rebuilding America's Defenses", posted on their own website, was written in 1996 and stated: A “core mission” for the transformed U.S. military is to “fight and decisively win multiple, simultaneous major theater wars” and that..

The strategic “transformation” of the U.S. military into an imperialistic force of global domination would require a huge increase in defense spending to “a minimum level of 3.5 to 3.8 percent of gross domestic product, adding $15 billion to $20 billion to total defense spending annually,” the PNAC plan said.“The process of transformation,” the plan said, “is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event—like a new Pearl Harbor.

Okay, they need a "new Pearl Harbor" to push their agenda through? Can you say 9/11?

The 2nd document is an official government document released through an FOIA(Freedom of Information Act Request). Thought to be nothing but a "conspiracy theory" for years, the document was released in 1994 and showed that Lyman Lemnitzer, Chiefs of Staff under John F. Kennedy, drew up a plan in 1962 to commit terrorist acts against America disguised as an attack by Cuba so that they could "preemptively strike", remember that word "pre-emptive strike"?(it was popularized by Bush before the new war in Iraq), Cuba during the Cuban Missle Crisis. Oh yeah, they planned on wrecking commerical airliners into buildings, shooting down John Glenn's space shuttle upon reentry into Earth's atmosphere and attack civilians in Florida, all under the guise of Communist Cuba. The "Northwoods Document", also known as "Operation Northwoods", was signed by all members of the joint chiefs of staff but was turned down by Kennedy, thank God. Don't believe it? See it for yourself.

The 3rd document is FM(Field Manual)30-31 B from the Pentagon, which describes how the US Government, working with British Inteligence(MI5)and NATO in the 50s and 60s, bombed locations all over Europe to blame it on "leftist subversives" and uproot foreign governments.

"Beware the leader who bangs the drums of war in order to whip the citizenry into patriotic fervor, for patriotism is indeed a double-edged sword. It both emboldens the blood, just as it narrows the mind. And when the drums of war reached a fever pitch and the blood boils with hate and the mind has 'closed', the leader will have no need in seizing the rights of the citizenry. Rather, the citizenry, infused with fear and blinded by patriotism, will offer up all their rights unto the leader and gladly so. How do I know? For this is what I have done. AND I AM CAESAR." --Julius Caesar

"The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country." --Hermann Goering

"If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy." -- James Madison

9/11 insurance Fraud

2005-05-09T09:15:00.000-07:00

Allianz Group is the insurance company that stands to pay 3 billion dollars to Larry Silverstein, lease holder of the world trade center since building number 7 fell at approximately 5:30PM on 9/11/01. There's only one problem. FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, says the building fell from fire damage, yet Larry Silverstein came right out on a PBS documentary "America Rebuilds" and said that they "pulled" building number 7, an industry term meaning controlled demolition. If Silverstein collects the policy on the basis that the building fell from fire damage, he will have commited insurance fraud.

A shareholder recently contacted Allianz's board of directors regarding this fraud and is pushing for an investigation.

I'm just trying to get the word out that one shareholder hasn't much power but tens of thousands of shareholders or potential shareholders have the authority to hire and fire the board of directors who in turn hire and fire the CEO and CFO as well as other key positions within the company since shareholders of publicly traded companies recieve ballots by mail to vote on the board of directors. If the board of directors at Allianz Group feel their jobs are on the line, they might be more inclined to investigate this fraud.

Why is all of this relevant to exposing the truth behind what really happened on 9/11? Because it takes days, if not weeks to plant demolition charges, and building number 7 crumbled at 5:30PM on 9/11, only hours after towers 1 and 2 fell. Building number 7 is a 49 story building that was "overengineered for total infrastructure breakdown". It was fireproof, had it's own air and water supplies and was a doomsday command center for FEMA and Rudy Guiliani.

Not coincidentally, the New York offices of the DOD(Department of Defense), CIA, Customs, SEC(Securities and Exchange Commission), and Secret Service were all in building 7.

Before 9/11, a steel structured building had never fallen from fire damage. They rationalize that since jumbo jets struck the towers, that their structural integrity was compromised, allowing the fires to finish the job. However, the engineers of the World Trade Center, cheifly Minuro Yamasaki, said they engineered the towers to withstand multiple jumbo jet impacts.

There is no reason the buildings would have crumbled to little more than soot without demolition charges in the buildings. Building 7 was not even struck by a plane, nor was it in the debris field of towers 1 and 2. Even had it been, it was the most structurally sound building in the complex and should have sustained heavy damage.

Even the Sheraton Hotel next to tower 2 had the building fall directly on top of it and had fires raging throughout, but never fell. If a real investigation into what happened to building 7 of the world trade center is done, I'm confident it could expose the whole shotty operation.

Listen to how Larry Silverstein uses the phrase "pull it" to mean controlled demoltion. How can we be sure he is referring to controlled demoltion?

Not only because Silverstein uses the phrase "pull it", not "pull" or "pull out", but because engineers at other points in the video use the term "pull it" over and over again to mean controlled demolition.

A couple of examples:

"We had to be careful how we pulled building 6"

"We're getting ready to pull building 6"

Listen to the context they use the phrase in and there can be no question. There are several video segments from "America Rebuilds" in the below link.

I strongly urge shareholders of Allianz Group, as well as non shareholders to contact Allianz's investor relations department. It is their job to deal with disgruntled shareholders and as far they are concerned, anyone contacting their office is a shareholder.

Phone: (781) 575-4328
Email: investor.relations@allianz.com

For more evidence that world trade center building 7 was a controlled demoltion, read my previous post "Thorough Indictment of US Government in the 9/11 Attacks".