9/11 insurance Fraud

Allianz Group is the insurance company that stands to pay 3 billion dollars to Larry Silverstein, lease holder of the world trade center since building number 7 fell at approximately 5:30PM on 9/11/01. There's only one problem. FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, says the building fell from fire damage, yet Larry Silverstein came right out on a PBS documentary "America Rebuilds" and said that they "pulled" building number 7, an industry term meaning controlled demolition. If Silverstein collects the policy on the basis that the building fell from fire damage, he will have commited insurance fraud.

A shareholder recently contacted Allianz's board of directors regarding this fraud and is pushing for an investigation.

I'm just trying to get the word out that one shareholder hasn't much power but tens of thousands of shareholders or potential shareholders have the authority to hire and fire the board of directors who in turn hire and fire the CEO and CFO as well as other key positions within the company since shareholders of publicly traded companies recieve ballots by mail to vote on the board of directors. If the board of directors at Allianz Group feel their jobs are on the line, they might be more inclined to investigate this fraud.

Why is all of this relevant to exposing the truth behind what really happened on 9/11? Because it takes days, if not weeks to plant demolition charges, and building number 7 crumbled at 5:30PM on 9/11, only hours after towers 1 and 2 fell. Building number 7 is a 49 story building that was "overengineered for total infrastructure breakdown". It was fireproof, had it's own air and water supplies and was a doomsday command center for FEMA and Rudy Guiliani.

Not coincidentally, the New York offices of the DOD(Department of Defense), CIA, Customs, SEC(Securities and Exchange Commission), and Secret Service were all in building 7.

Before 9/11, a steel structured building had never fallen from fire damage. They rationalize that since jumbo jets struck the towers, that their structural integrity was compromised, allowing the fires to finish the job. However, the engineers of the World Trade Center, cheifly Minuro Yamasaki, said they engineered the towers to withstand multiple jumbo jet impacts.

There is no reason the buildings would have crumbled to little more than soot without demolition charges in the buildings. Building 7 was not even struck by a plane, nor was it in the debris field of towers 1 and 2. Even had it been, it was the most structurally sound building in the complex and should have sustained heavy damage.

Even the Sheraton Hotel next to tower 2 had the building fall directly on top of it and had fires raging throughout, but never fell. If a real investigation into what happened to building 7 of the world trade center is done, I'm confident it could expose the whole shotty operation.

Listen to how Larry Silverstein uses the phrase "pull it" to mean controlled demoltion. How can we be sure he is referring to controlled demoltion?

Not only because Silverstein uses the phrase "pull it", not "pull" or "pull out", but because engineers at other points in the video use the term "pull it" over and over again to mean controlled demolition.

A couple of examples:

"We had to be careful how we pulled building 6"

"We're getting ready to pull building 6"

Listen to the context they use the phrase in and there can be no question. There are several video segments from "America Rebuilds" in the below link.

I strongly urge shareholders of Allianz Group, as well as non shareholders to contact Allianz's investor relations department. It is their job to deal with disgruntled shareholders and as far they are concerned, anyone contacting their office is a shareholder.

Phone: (781) 575-4328
Email: investor.relations@allianz.com

For more evidence that world trade center building 7 was a controlled demoltion, read my previous post "Thorough Indictment of US Government in the 9/11 Attacks".